silverado427

Oh man that's great

That's some funny shit .

+1

Nice shotty

I had that same thought myself.

lol +1

Actually its the criminal that has made the STUPID decision, and deemed his life was of no value by committing a criminal act and by his total disregard of the law.

Till people take a stand, Criminals will continue to enjoy your way of thinking.

Me either

I'm going to have to get a rifle, Or at least some slugs for the mossy

How about just plain old respect.

W T F is wrong with people

That's funny

This is the only thing i understand ... The Legislature finds and declares that: a. It is proper for law-abiding people to protect themselves, their families and others from intruders and attackers without fear of prosecution or civil action for acting in defense of their own well being and the well being of others. b. The "Castle Doctrine" is a long-standing American legal concept arising from English Common Law that provides that one's abode is a special area in which one enjoys certain protections and immunities, that one is not obligated to retreat before defending oneself against attack, and that one may do so without fear of prosecution. c. Article I of the New Jersey Constitution guarantees the citizens of this State the rights "of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness." d. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution affords the people of this nation the right to keep and bear arms. e. All who reside in and all who visit this State have a right to expect to be unmolested and safe within their homes, residences and vehicles. f. No person should be required, as a point of law, to surrender their personal safety or well being to the unlawful actions of a criminal, nor to needlessly retreat in the face of intrusion or attack. g. It is, therefore, altogether fitting and proper, and within the public interest, to ensure that law-abiding people are justified in protecting themselves, their families and others from intruders and attackers, and that they may do so without fear of prosecution or civil action. 3. N.J.S.2C:3-4 is amended to read as follows: 2C:3-4. Use of Force in Self-Protection. a. Use of force justifiable for protection of the person. Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 2C:3-9, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor reasonably believes that such force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting

Amen

What happens when your dog goes into protection mode on a home intrusion, And fubar's the intruder ?

I have a question. ? Are you safe in water when the zombies come, You never see zombies in water .

+1

Well thanks for all your thoughts, this was a pretty civilized post. Me personally I don't wish to hurt anyone. i live in the delusional world of respect for others, and their property. my world is black and white. I have no gray area. Just right and wrong !!! that's how I live my life. And as far as the persona I give off , Oh well Lib's are going to hate folks who don't see their way Whether its guns , knives , knuckles or ideas.

How is that possible. ? How is a person or the prosecutor going to tell me what and how my fears of imminent danger are. If you enter My house with out my permission while i'm sleeping, Guess what i'm naturally going to fear for mine and my family's life.

The way i think all the blame lies on the intruder, no if ands or buts. What if she had a weapon of some sort would she still be thought of as just a drunk girl. In my younger days i've had a pop or two and guess what i never wandered into someone else's house.

I'm just wondering what be your thoughts on this subject. In my mind a intruder is a intruder, Male , female , alien , zombie , whatever . the fact that she is a drunk 21 year old girl doesn't matter, or does it, What's your feeling on this issue http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/colorado-college-student-shot-trespassing-16435872

Of course I did