NJGF

The prosecutor leads the grand jury so he can convince them of pretty much anything he wants. Mas spoke about how the prosecutor will tell the jury: ....that you purposely used ammunition that is used to make a bigger hole in the poor young victim (while holding up his grade school graduation picture). That ammunition has only one purpose to kill and wound people. Even the NATO armed forces don't even allow it. You must convict this criminal for his complete disregard for the life of the victim... You get the picture. No reloads, stock guns only, and no back plate on the firearm with a skull on it. Just try to make it harder to convince a jury of your guilt. Obviously you can refute all of this but you are leaving it up to people on the jury that know nothing about firearms beyond what they see in the movies and on TV.

And we can't forget dum-dum bullets either. NJ is so messed up.

You have to signup by May 24th and can shoot it until May 31st.

I doubt any conspiracy as they own many hundreds of boards. This is this what they do. But in any event you never know what the future holds. You can see their portfolio at: http://www.verticalscope.com/ They have been making major acquisitions over the past few years.

It can take a very long time to get a patent.

Me too.

http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/PRNJ PRNJ Peoples' Republic of New Jersey

I saw that one recently and cringed when he said it..

From the NJSP website at: http://www.njsp.org/firearms/transport-hollowpoint.shtml Transportation and Use of Hollow Point Ammunition by SportsmenProvided certain conditions are met, a sportsman may transport and use hollow point ammunition. There are no restrictions preventing a sportsman from keeping such ammunition at his home. N.J.S.A 2C:39-3f(1) limits the possession of hollow nose ammunition. However, there is a general exception that allows for the purchase of this ammunition but restricts the possession of it to specified locations. This exception provides that: (2) Nothing is sub section f (1) shall be construed to prevent a person from keeping such ammunition at his dwelling, premises or other land owned or possessed by him, or from carrying such ammunition from the place of purchase to said dwelling or land . . . [N.J.S.A 26:39-3g (2)]. Thus a person may purchase this ammunition and keep it within the confines of his property. Sub section f (1) further exempts from the prohibited possession of hollow nose ammunition "persons engaged in activities pursuant to N.J.S.A 2C:39-6f. . . ." N.J.S.A 26:39-3f. (1). Activities contained in N.J.S.A 26:39-6f. can be broken down as follows: A member of a rifle or pistol club organized under rules of the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and which filed its charter with the State Police; A person engaged in hunting or target practice with a firearm legal for hunting in this State; A person going directly to a target range, and; A person going directly to an authorized place for "practice, match, target, trap or skeet shooting exhibitions."

Excellent article thanks for the link.

I thought that at least in Northern CA you can get a carry permit from the local Sheriff. Isn't it on a county by county basis?

Say it ain't so...I just mailed in my application for one this week!

Yup

Might (probably) is bogus but still a funny story.

NJ already has the strictest requirements in the country and we have pretty much lost in NJ courts and through the Federal 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. The ninth Supreme Court justice could be the ultimate decision maker and possibly our only hope of any real change. But this could take years or decades to decide. The only real solution is to just move.

Sorry for the mistake but the bill I mentioned was introduced by Bobby Jindal but died in committee in the Senate. Subsequently H.R. 5441 (109th): Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2007 was passed by the House and Senate and signed by the president on October 4, 2006. The full bill is here: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/109/hr5441/text The President's statement when he signed it is here: https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/10/20061004-10.html And the full history of the bill is here: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/109/hr5441 It is a large bill but you can find the appropriate text by searching for: PROHIBITION ON CONFISCATION OF FIREARMS

Sure he can do anything he wants in an executive action BUT the legislation gets the final say. They are not not passing any new legislation. They have the power in a concurrent resolution with a simple majority of both houses to effectively invalidate an executive action. Article V Section IV of the NJ Constitution: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/lawsconstitution/constitution.asp " 6. No rule or regulation made by any department, officer, agency or authority of this state, except such as relates to the organization or internal management of the State government or a part thereof, shall take effect until it is filed either with the Secretary of State or in such other manner as may be provided by law. The Legislature shall provide for the prompt publication of such rules and regulations. The Legislature may review any rule or regulation to determine if the rule or regulation is consistent with the intent of the Legislature as expressed in the language of the statute which the rule or regulation is intended to implement. Upon a finding that an existing or proposed rule or regulation is not consistent with legislative intent, the Legislature shall transmit this finding in the form of a concurrent resolution to the Governor and the head of the Executive Branch agency which promulgated, or plans to promulgate, the rule or regulation. The agency shall have 30 days to amend or withdraw the existing or proposed rule or regulation. If the agency does not amend or withdraw the existing or proposed rule or regulation, the Legislature may invalidate that rule or regulation, in whole or in part, or may prohibit that proposed rule or regulation, in whole or in part, from taking effect by a vote of a majority of the authorized membership of each House in favor of a concurrent resolution providing for invalidation or prohibition, as the case may be, of the rule or regulation. This vote shall not take place until at least 20 calendar days after the placing on the desks of the members of each House of the Legislature in open meeting of the transcript of a public hearing held by either House on the invalidation or prohibition of the rule or regulation." It is not so easy in the federal government. Congress can pass a new bill to invalidate an executive action but the President can veto it. Congress then has to have enough votes to override the veto. This allows the President to have much more power. The alternative is to go to court and Obama hasn't been so successful there.

As a result of the confiscations during Katrina, there was a federal law that prevents that: SEC. 557. Title VII of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5201) ''SEC. 706. FIREARMS POLICIES. ''(a) PROHIBITION ON CONFISCATION OF FIREARMS.” No officer or employee of the United States (including any member of the uniformed services), or person operating pursuant to or under color of Federal law, or receiving Federal funds, or under control of any Federal official, or providing services to such an officer, employee, or other person, while acting in support of relief from a major disaster or emergency, may” ''(1) temporarily or permanently seize, or authorize seizure of, any firearm the possession of which is not prohibited under Federal, State, or local law, other than for forfeiture in compliance with Federal law or as evidence in a criminal investigation;

What's somewhat funny was when everyone condemned the governor for not doing an executive action to just do away with justifiable need. Now we see that the governor doesn't have that kind of power without the legislature.

Yes my understanding is that they will be discounting Glocks.

Very nice but I don't think you should expect a reply.

No it looks like it only addresses justifiable need as they don't consider "serious threats" sufficient! So we can apparently still stop at the bathroom. I can't imagine what the free states think of NJ. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2016/Bills/SCR/101_I1.PDF

Just move to PA. it is not worth fighting for NJ.

I am guessing that after Katrina they changed their attitude. If you look at their suggestions they are pretty extensive. I guess prepping has gone mainstream.

Wow, but I shouldn't be surprised. I have received at least polite replies from even anti-2A politicians in the past.