wooly bugger

Who's taking property? This guy needs to stay on point!

I think this would actually help us. Some of these are so loony (ammo serialization), and he doesn't have a line item veto, so if he vetoes, he can just point to the looniest parts and say he had to. I wish this loud guy would either stick to the point or shut up. Bach gives short, laser sharp statements.

As I sink into despair, I keep one beam of hope in my mind. Christie is a brick wall when it comes to signing legislation. He signed only about 80 bills into law last year. I think he understands that the unintended consequences of anything he passes can come back to bite him on the national level. If he passes all of these poor excuses for legislation, that's half his yearly quota.

Noooo, don't teach them about reloading! Now they're going to ban that.

I didn't see the part about scissors. I can think of another way to defend yourself against guns.... Hmm. http://www.nj.com/morris/index.ssf/2013/02/teachers_at_morris_knolls_lear.html#incart_river_default

deleted

This guy needs to shut up

Someone say, he could have killled as many with 200 as 6000! Yes to this guy on bricks of ammo!

We're losing this one, no doubt. But it's starting to sound like a filibuster. Wasn't this suppose to end at 1?

What's wrong with my original post?

What's FTFY?

Oops, she just got crushed.

OH, great. NOW the committee is questioning the anti!!!

If they cut off public debate in interest of time, do we have any standing to challenge? At this point, they'll be going until midnight. Oh, brother. Ceasefire just came up. 2, 3, 4 gunmen isn't "hypothetical"

I wish I could be there. I have an impossible conflict. We need to focus on facts, facts, facts. Some of the testimony is too emotional or opinion based. We're not going to change their minds based on theological arguments.

Do we know for sure that he carries? I will contribute to a fund to hire a detective to investigate his background. There's got to be something here.

For A3772, please someone say that a PD FID person says he's overwhelmed with what he has. 5 year reapplications will grind the system to a halt. Could mention de facto bad will be unconstitutional. They won't listen to us but may listen to their own PDs.

Is a anyone on the committee saying anything positive, or are they just silently listening to us?

I heard key Republican McGurkin isn't bothering to go. Will his vote at least be registered? I wrote/faxed/called his office to express great disappointment. Apparently, it wasn't his "Trenton day."

I hope you have a chance to speak. I think $$$ is the only thing they'll listen to, and that's how we need to frame our arguments. As I posted elsewhere, the every 5 year FID reapplications goes through, there will be a tremendous budget impact on tooling up every PD to create photo ID cards and to deal with an additional 200k applications a year.

What did Ruger do? Soon Cuomo will be on TV saying, "you don't neeeeeeed Olympic Arms to fight criminals."

"Now to say the fondling fathers..." Great, now they're going after Catholics too. :-) This thread has given me a much needed laugh. If by any chance either of these articles are true, they have done us a big favor by exposing their own stupidity. The C-section comment is priceless. I'll remember that

I used to read both WSJ and NYT. Now I won't touch NYT. Their unashamed agenda driven, hack job reporting has me sick. Like the one about the conspiracy of gun makers to hook kids on assault rifles. Or the one about how the AR boom is only because gun makers have tricked us sheep into buying their wicked products.

I also got a short but personalized letter from Doherty. If I were rich, each of these guys would be getting the max contribution from me

Awesome! I'll import into Outlook when I get to the office tomorrow.