1LtCAP

my bank forces me to change the password every 3 months, and it can't be the same as one used in the last 6 months.....then of course the stupid special characters and all......

rather than all the in-fighting........which is gonna cost us...and has cost us in the past.....how about we just take it for what it is? we have doubts on his 2a stance, but he seems pretty strong on the constitution. that parts good. it would almost dictate that if a good 2a case comes up, he'd vote in favor of 2a. lets get on with our lives, knowing that there's not some ultra-liberal shitballer being appointed, which would screw things up for your kids and your grandkids. it seems likely that trump will get at least 1 more chance to appoint a justice. hopefully that one will be the ultra-2a friendly justice we want. in the meantime, we've at least gottan a justice we need. by that i mean one that'll actually go by the law, rather than making up his own laws to justify his interpretations of the constitution.

and i'm sharing my multiple experiences. kinda like they didn't raise prices during the panic after sandy hook. or during any of the other panics from my experience. virtually EVERYone there was nothing short of respectful and super friendly towards mom. i don't give them my money. they earned it. there's a big difference there.

i thought you had to heat kydex to form it? how did he custom fit it? curious minds need to know

wow.....i don't think i even wanna read past this post on pg5........this thread has deteriorated rather quickly into a mudslinging contest.

there's rumors floating(probably false) that klinton is gonna try again in 2020........so......trump vs klinton. who ya voting for?

the bob viden i know sure as heck isn't thin.

congressional or presidential?

i didn't read the whole thread. but.......save your money, and buy a garand, and an m1a. those are 2 purchases you will NEVER regret. in fact there's a member on here selling a very nice looking garand. and he's a very good guy. i've bought from him.

i believe what she said('cause i don't want my ass kicked by a leather clad woman...althoughhhhh.......) but i also believe what i was told. either way. this thread got hijacked pretty quick. he's friggin sponsoring nappen coming to the area to inform us. also......he and his employees helped my mother do a 180 on guns....she went from "only cops and military should have them" to......darn.....i was wrong. gun people are really nice. his people doing good for mom has won me.

https://reason.com/blog/2018/07/06/scotus-contender-brett-kavanaugh-on-gun on one hand i agree...on the other hand not. it leaves open the opportunity to attempt such....but it appears as if he along with the other conservatives would go against such bans if brought to the sc

In Heller," Kavanaugh noted, "the Supreme Court held that handguns—the vast majority of which today are semi-automatic—are constitutionally protected because they have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens. There is no meaningful or persuasive constitutional distinction between semi-automatic handguns and semi-automatic rifles. Semi-automatic rifles, like semi-automatic handguns, have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens for self-defense in the home, hunting, and other lawful uses. Moreover, semi-automatic handguns are used in connection with violent crimes far more than semi-automatic rifles are. It follows from Heller's protection of semi-automatic handguns that semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally protected and that D.C.'s ban on them is unconstitutional." Although Heller suggested that various "longstanding" gun restrictions would pass constitutional muster, Kavanaugh said, D.C.'s gun registration system does not qualify. "Because the vast majority of states have not traditionally required and even now do not require registration of lawfully possessed guns," he wrote, "D.C.'s registration law—which is the strictest in the Nation and mandates registration of all guns—does not satisfy the history- and tradition-based test set forth in Heller." Kavanaugh also is sensitive to the constitutional implications of regulations that interfere with freedom of speech. In 2009, a year before the Supreme Court overturned statutory restrictions on the political speech of unions and corporations in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, he wrote an opinion rejecting FEC rules that made it harder for advocacy groups to raise money.

Kavanaugh, who has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit since 2006, dissented from a 2011 decision in which a three-judge panel upheld the District of Columbia's ban on so-called assault weapons and its requirement that all guns be registered. Kavanaugh disagreed with the majority's use of "intermediate scrutiny," saying an analysis "based on text, history, and tradition" is more consistent with the Supreme Court's Second Amendment precedents. The D.C. "assault weapon" ban covers a list of specific models as well as guns that meet certain criteria. A semi-automatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine is illegal, for instance, if it has any of six prohibited features, including an adjustable stock, a pistol grip, or a flash suppressor. "The list appears to be haphazard," Kavanaugh noted. "It bans certain semi-automatic rifles but not others—with no particular explanation or rationale for why some made the list and some did not." In any case, he concluded, the law is inconsistent with the landmark 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller.

they just announced kavanaugh. isn't he a "not-so-good" choice?

that is what i was referencing when i mentioned that there were lies told about them being kicked out....'cause they weren't. neither he nor his employees expressed that view when i asked them. this was about 2 years ago though.

ya gotta remember....people lied about getting thrown out of there when there was a petition being passed.

that's odd.....'cause i directly asked one day, and didn't get that.

what'd the guy saying that look like? i gotta call bs on that. i shoot there, and have bought a lot there. i've NEVER heard any talk like that there. ever. also, as the owner of the shop, he can carry there without a permit.

i'm fine with ultra-conservative......but not speaking to his dad due to an election? that's bullshit and childish. that by itself would make me worry about him.

would they be known as............... The Mod Squad ?

no. when impossible crap goes wrong, is what happens in movies...... i hope they find a way. i can't imagine why they started a tradition of doing this just before monsoon season in the first place. i think they've got 2 choices. scuba out, or continue on and hope to find another exit.

i'd love to go to this, but i'm still working at 6

until boners keep posting things like this on the interweb about them anyway.

no, they haven't, and it'd be good if you people would stop broadcasting this shit out in the open, giving the powers that be the ideas to make them illegal.

dirty harry marathon on sundance too