1LtCAP

would this not preclude the possibility of him having had a ccw? "second-degree possession of a firearm for an unlawful purpose"""" dude looks like a liberal kook. if he did have one....maybe a fall guy?

little off the wall here......but........for those places that do not wish a firearm to be brought in....the onus should be on them to provide safe and secure storage areas.

the guns n gadgets guy seems to think that something else may be coming down the pike making this batter.....

yea. she's not anti-gun....but i'm pretty sure she'll give me the old "why do you feel the need to carry a gun here?"

sooo....when i take mom to my aunts this weekend for memorial day, i gotta ask her before i can enter her house while carrying?

they labeled them cop killer bullets? aren't hollow points less likely to penetrate body armor? due to their expansion?

so they're calling all of us criminals. and they're trying the "well they did it, so you should too" argument.......

@Mrs. Peel i got this in email today. https://kingsumo.com/g/e6wfcm/women-of-vedder-launch-giveaway?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=campaign&_kx=Y9hpC_iCVec2EwI0xi4uUCYXZvJi2xv4R9qshfi49g4%3D.KGtdjg

possibly gaslighting would be a more accurate term?

thanks. that's what i was missing, and it was getting under my skin a little.

i get that. where i was going with my question though..... if federal law allows standard capacity mags, nfa items, and other things......then states like nj come along and say those are a nogo.....well if federal law always trumps state/local laws, then those state/local laws don't hold water. just like the leosa thing. i'm not trying to be a wise azz. just trying to figure out how we haven't fought illegal laws that way as yet. eSPECIALLY in the area of the 2a as there is no provision within that for state/local govts to play the games they are all across the country. and i know scotus just said they can do some......

i ordered a pair of these to try. i've been happy with my other lapg stuff, so hopefully these'll be the same.

sorry to cut up your post, and to probably derail this thread......but that last statement you typed there. why has no one fought against nj's (illegal) gun control laws using that?

nyc can't sink fast enough. at the rate it's going, all the rats will have time to flee the sinking ship and infect somewhere else

wait? anti-brandishing? so.....say for instance, you need to draw.......and upon seeing the firearm, the assailant de-escalates. in the meantime, someone saw you draw, and calls 911. now are you guilty of brandishing?

that part's a bit worrisome, huh?

regarding nd while reholstering......when i'm reholstering anything inside the waistband, i always look the pistol back intot he holster. and i don't rush. ever.

so this is a good thing, correct?

i don't carry anything on my person unholstered. i don't wanna become a statistic. or experience getting shot.

thanks for that! i'll be ordering one of those puppies!

i'm trying to work with what i've got. i have my 92. i've carried that, and train with it too. i'll be getting a iwb holster for my sig too. but........so far, the 19 is the most comfortable to tuck in the waist....

thanks! i was asking....because i still can't get myself to chamber a round when carrying the glock. why? because of the safety in the trigger. if something snags the trigger, chances are good it's gonna snag that safety too. i get that it's safe, simply because millions of people carry these things. i just haven't got my own head around it yet. i don't have an issue with a chambered round in any of my hammer fired guns.......

just outta curiousity....what safeties do glocks have? besides the blade on the trigger?

so far....but he still took the ride. i wonder what that did to his right to carry......