1LtCAP

far as i know, you only have to stop if they're already in the crosswalk.

depends on the battery. if you got an el cheapo.....autozone, pepboys etc.......you've got something bad inside the battery. i get a LOT of those bad. if it's a side post battery, take the terminals off again, and check inside the insulation surrounding the terminal itself. very often those things will build up ungodly amounts of corrosion, which will prevent the battery from taking a proper charge. if you're anywhere near cherry hill, i can test it for ya.

depending on exactly what you're looking for....there's an aimpoint pro in the market place......

i have the 2014 version at home......

search back through the thread. there's links to it.

that's the problem. you're caught up. the part he posted in red is the important part. as mentioned time and time again. zombie breaks in, while you're sitting on the crapper......you do not have to run away, give up ground, give him any brains, nothing. it specifically states that you as the homeowner may estimate the force necessary, and exercise said force to protect yourself, your family, and your abode.

nice breakdown. i also forgot to mention.....that lawyer gave the "safe" response.

i know what i will do. there is no place within my home to safely retreat to, nor is there a safe egress. i will not cower in a corner. if mom's up here(she will be up here till just after christmas), she is my responsibility. no one will get past me to hurt her. that's about all i can really say about that.

from my understanding, as long as it fits within our laws, then there's no requirements for you to tell anyone. as long as it was acquired legally. i could be wrong though.

i understand you may have asked him a specific question....but that was by no means a specific answer. specific answer would've been "in nj you have a duty to retreat within your home."

so essentially, this is another form of registration added onto the registration we already go through.....'cause now there's a cc number used in conjunction with the application process, and god only knows whoelse gets copies of this since it's online......

i'll go by the statutes, unless mr nappen comes in here and says different........

he didn't specify where.

statutes are not opinions.

are you reading it? (i)The actor is not obliged to retreat from his dwelling, unless he was the initial aggressor; and (ii)A public officer justified in using force in the performance of his duties or a person justified in the actor is the person using force against the intruder. it is plain as day, which is rather rare for nj statutes. 2C:3-4 section 2 paragraph b, sub paragraphs i and ii. i have the entire 2c bookmarked on my home puter. i'll link it when i get home.

you talking about this part? :::::: (b)The actor knows that he can avoid the necessity of using such force with complete safety by retreating or by surrendering possession of a thing to a person asserting a claim of right thereto or by complying with a demand that he abstain from any action which he has no duty to take, except that: (i)The actor is not obliged to retreat from his dwelling, unless he was the initial aggressor; and (ii)A public officer justified in using force in the performance of his duties or a person justified in using force in his assistance or a person justified in using force in making an arrest or preventing an escape is not obliged to desist from efforts to perform such duty, effect such arrest or prevent such escape because of resistance or threatened resistance by or on behalf of the person against whom such action is directed.::::::::

the bolded part is not applicable inside the dwelling, but rather outside on the property. that's why i left it out.

i'll paste in the link..... http://www.njlaws.com/2C.3-4SelfDefense.htm

c. (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of N.J.S.2C:3-5, N.J.S.2C:3-9, or this section, the use of force or deadly force upon or toward an intruder who is unlawfully in a dwelling is justifiable when the actor reasonably believes that the force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting himself or other persons in the dwelling against the use of unlawful force by the intruder on the present occasion. (2)A reasonable belief exists when the actor, to protect himself or a third person, was in his own dwelling at the time of the offense or was privileged to be thereon and the encounter between the actor and intruder was sudden and unexpected, compelling the actor to act instantly and: (a)The actor reasonably believed that the intruder would inflict personal injury upon the actor or others in the dwelling; or (b)The actor demanded that the intruder disarm, surrender or withdraw, and the intruder refused to do so. (3)An actor employing protective force may estimate the necessity of using force when the force is used, without retreating, surrendering possession, withdrawing or doing any other act which he has no legal duty to do or abstaining from any lawful action. L.1978, c.95; amended 1987, c.120, s.1; 1999, c.73. 2C:3-5. Use of force for the protection of other persons a. Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 2C:3-9, the use of force upon or toward the person of another is justifiable to protect a third person when: (1) The actor would be justified under section 2C:3-4 in using such force to protect himself against the injury he believes to be threatened to the person whom he seeks to protect; and (2) Under the circumstances as the actor reasonably believes them to be, the person whom he seeks to protect would be justified in using such protective force; and (3) The actor reasonably believes that his intervention is necessary for the protection of such other person. b. Notwithstanding subsection a. of this section:

i have caller id. i just did one. it's almost always an out of the area area code. usually kalifornia, oregon, or arizona. sometimes texas. it'll simply say the city and state. sometimes it says the business, such as this last one....expand pay taxe......i pikcup, and listen for a second, to be sure that it's not a possible customer, since i get some military customers. once i hear the robot start, i hit *82, then hang up. sometimes it's a live person. it seems to work on those too. kinda funny, i had one yesterday that asked for the guy that used to own the place. he's been out since 2008.

but that doesn't answer which laws this guy thinks are constitutional. 'cause i don't think any that restrict us are.

c. (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of N.J.S.2C:3-5, N.J.S.2C:3-9, or this section, the use of force or deadly force upon or toward an intruder who is unlawfully in a dwelling is justifiable when the actor reasonably believes that the force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting himself or other persons in the dwelling against the use of unlawful force by the intruder on the present occasion. (2)A reasonable belief exists when the actor, to protect himself or a third person, was in his own dwelling at the time of the offense or was privileged to be thereon and the encounter between the actor and intruder was sudden and unexpected, compelling the actor to act instantly and: (a)The actor reasonably believed that the intruder would inflict personal injury upon the actor or others in the dwelling; or (b)The actor demanded that the intruder disarm, surrender or withdraw, and the intruder refused to do so. (3)An actor employing protective force may estimate the necessity of using force when the force is used, without retreating, surrendering possession, withdrawing or doing any other act which he has no legal duty to do or abstaining from any lawful action. L.1978, c.95; amended 1987, c.120, s.1; 1999, c.73. 2C:3-5. Use of force for the protection of other persons a. Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 2C:3-9, the use of force upon or toward the person of another is justifiable to protect a third person when: (1) The actor would be justified under section 2C:3-4 in using such force to protect himself against the injury he believes to be threatened to the person whom he seeks to protect; and (2) Under the circumstances as the actor reasonably believes them to be, the person whom he seeks to protect would be justified in using such protective force; and (3) The actor reasonably believes that his intervention is necessary for the protection of such other person. b. Notwithstanding subsection a. of this section:

NO. inside your dwelling, you have no duty to retreat.

land line. through crapcast. i don't generally get those kinds of calls on my cell, which is through tmobile....although there's been one hitting me something like 20 times in 2 days.........i blacklisted it, but i still see the logs.

on everything you mentioned beside guns, it's also not just this state. most states are in trouble with a lot of that stuff......especially it seems to be pension funds......