JohnnyB

^^^^THIS^^^^ Do not involve another state! Find a range that is on that route and print out the map and range info. If stopped, you are headed for that range. Don't go to New York!

He does. He will respond in the GFH section. Name is Gunforhire. That's Ant.

^^^^THIS^^^^ Welcome from Woodbury!

With the stock being adjustable in length without tools, even only an inch. It needs to be pinned to stay PRNJ legal IMHO.

I did with a permanent marker. I don't think you have to sign it though.

None of this blocking of Trump's Executive orders is about the Constitution. It's all about politics! Of all the liberal Circuit Judges out there, surely one will rule against anything Trump tries to do. This crap has to end now!

When my company has to deliver copiers and steps are involved, we use an Escalera. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU-ITV-D04Q

Too long! Welcome Mrs. Zeke. You finally broke the ice.

Hi Mrs. Zeek. Are you there? Welcome to the Forum.

If I were the OP. I would fill out two COEs and take possession of the lower. Provided he has a valid FID card and it's not stamped Colt AR-15. On a SEPARATE trip, he could take the evil upper to a LGS for compliance work. All perfectly legal and he could then put it back together and he has a new, legal rifle. If the OP has no ARs at home, he could take the upper and do the compliance work himself at home. Lots of legal ways to handle this! Just don't transport both parts at once.

^^^^THIS^^^^ Once the lower or upper is removed from the house, neither is illegal. Provided no other ARs live there. There can be no constructive intent without both pieces. Be sure the lower is not stamped "AR-15". If the lower is removed, a COE should be filled out in duplicate.

Definitely part of an alarm system. It is a mirror to re-aim a laser light to cover an area. We used to call them "Beams" in alarm lingo. If it is pointing at nothing and nothing is pointing at it. It is simply a relic of an old alarm system my friend.

Until now, no references were ever contacted for anyone on this forum. There must have been a glitch in the system. This is a really good sign though, since they have moved beyond that phase and now consider him eligible for the permit pending the results of the references. Congratulations Golf! Better late than never.

It is a really small envelope. Very easy to miss.

I always carry mine because I never know if I will be buying a gun that day. I also carry extra COEs. Any day I buy a new gun is a GOOD day! Logic dictates you should always be prepared to have a GOOD day!

15 days. Ray just set a new record! Man that was quick!

Good decision! Now we don't have to read your story in the news!

^^^^THIS^^^^ I believe the statute reads something like "capable of holding more than 15 rounds and can reliably feed a semi-auto". I don't recall the exemption for people that don't have the semi-auto. LEO and military are the only exemptions I recall.

Here ya go Brian! https://www.etsy.com/listing/505759708/dissent-notorious-rbg-doll?&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=shopping_us_b-art_and_collectibles-dolls_and_miniatures-art_dolls_and_figurines&utm_custom1=1fd16bbf-12bd-4947-bd72-a03b93a14c9a&gclid=CJGt2Jb2rNMCFUdXDQodPzAEEQ Hand made to order. Extra powerful!

CORNEAL IMPLANTS!

We still have the California case to hope for.

No. You buy it as a rifle. It would then be illegal to use it for a pistol. If purchased to make a pistol, then yes, a P2P would be needed.

Same here. Trimmed and laminated. My card is 34 years old and I always keep it in my wallet, just in case. Looks like crap but it always works.

I blew up the image and the lower has not been milled yet. The bits are unused. Technically, he has all the parts except the lower. 80% lowers are legal to purchase in the PRNJ because they are NOT a gun. I have all the components in my house to build a .22 zip gun. Rubber bands, nails wood, old metal tubes etc. Does this make me a criminal if I have all the stuff to do an illegal thing but have not done it yet? Will they now consider an 80% lower a firearm? If so, there goes that loophole. If not, there is no "constructive intent" since technically he did not have a lower. It's a slippery slope we are on with this one! No, I am not defending the little bastard. I just see the PRNJ banning possession of 80% lowers soon!

Suppose the cops did not arrive as fast as they did! One made the mistake of retrieving the weapon, loading and holstering it. The other by forcibly gaining control of that weapon and he was on his way back to confront his attackers. No way in hell did either man make a sound decision and no way should either get community service. The only reason no one was shot was because the cops diffused what was going to happen! Do I feel bad for them? Yes. Do I think they should get off with a light sentence? Unfortunately, no! You or I would not have given the same circumstance.