Darrenf

At this point my wife and I have had over 400 meals from Blue Apron, I can only remember one leaving us still a bit hungry. I also think we are up to 4 meals that we felt didn't taste fantastic and 1 that we actually threw out. Pretty good record in my opinion. As to costs, we have tried to replicate some of their meals, and more times than not it costs us more to get the same quality of ingredients on our own. Blue Apron is not only convenient, it is also cost effective for us.

We've been doing Blue Apron for about 2 1/2 years now and still love it. We get 3 meals for 2 people every week. I have a few free boxes to give away (3 meals for 2 people), so if you want, PM me your email and I can send you a link.

Like I said, I've seen enough to know I don't need to listen to you on these issues. And yes, I read your links that you kept peddling before I made that decision. I act in ways some might consider "arrogant". You my friend, make me look absolutely servile in comparison.

Um, $69-$10 = $59.

The FACT that you think law is not opinion tells me all I need to know about whether to listen to you anymore on this.

So what are me and the entire community to do if the court won't hear the cases or rule in our favor? No, I stick by what I said, we need that 5th justice. That doesn't mean that we can't still be activists. Not sure why you would see it as a dichotomy.

Damn it. We seriously need that 5th justice soon!

I'm averaging 3 months with one set this year taking 6 months.

I believe they are saying it was F35 testing along the Delaware river. The inversion later today could cause a sonic boom to travel a long ways. I heard and felt it in Buena this morning. Almost ran out of the house.

It will only be available on the 21st in limited quantities.

That sucks. I’m sure the buffer zone distance had nothing to do with it. Knowing NOTHING about it I feel reasonable in guessing the hunter was a total moron and possibly even a psychopath.

What the hell is a “Tonka”?

Yep. You are correct. Haven’t ever heard of anyone getting snagged for this but that is how the law is written.

That programming is hard to shed.

How do you think contemptuous legislation gets through? It's called compromise. Again, a pawn for a greater gain. If it doesn't work out, so be it, but it looks like a shrewd move to me so far.

I've already answered that above.

No one at the NRA and certainly not me think they will be satisfied. That's not what this is about.

Just because the appeal has been cancelled doesn't mean they are going shall issue anytime soon. The case simply says the current law has to be rewritten, so they will drag their feet as long as they can to rewrite it, and you can bet if they can find some way to rewrite it that will be essentially the same as may issue while being worded differently, they will do that. As long as we have the numbers in the supreme court eventually shall issue will triumph, but every may issue jurisdiction will delay that day as long as they possibly can. That is why this wasn't appealed to the Supreme court, as doing so would have shortened the time before we get shall issue here in NJ, and they are all about delaying this as long as they can. I hope you're right though and they realize this is a losing issue and they stop wasting taxpayer funds and capitulate.

It hasn't even been 24 hours yet, but the NRA made it clear what they want, and the word in quotes should clue you in.

Moderate and fringe are not mutually exclusive. Moderate can be a position, fringe can be a position or a percentage of population. She was not moderate, but she also wasn’t fringe when defined as percentage of the population. She got the majority support of the decision makers. That isn’t fringe, that’s majority. It’s semantics, so we can both be right in this case. We might just have been talking about different things.

Exactly! Didn’t we just have an event two Saturdays ago where we discussed that we here in the 2nd amendment community are our own worst enemies. This thread is a prime example. Now the NRA gets to show they can compromise, puts the onus on the dems to show they can “reciprocate” and not long after we can get this overturned in the courts.

I don’t know how you can consider the party’s candidate for president to be fringe. Despite the claims that the fix was in against Sanders, it was the leadership I.e. those in control of the party that nominated her.

I didn’t say it is all dems, but it’s not so fringe either. Cripes, their presidential candidate last year wanted us to institute what Australia has.

It MiGHT, and that’s a big MIGHT, help us get national reciprocity, but it will not appease the dems in any way, as anything shy of full disarmament is unacceptable to them.

The diversity panel was fantastic.