Darrenf

If it were a risk factor that could rise above statistical noise, then we would have a really serious violence problem, since up to 97% are exposed. GMAFB.

I wish I could agree, but my wife suffers from MS and if it gets in the upper 80s she can’t walk. ☹️

So the more data you can correlate the more solid your argument? What’s your opinion on global warming?

What makes you think any lawmaker under the 2nd circuit cares one iota about federal laws?

Oh, well I'm convinced now. no doubt those same "researchers" could call watching football a risk factor.

Blaming video games is no different than blaming guns for violence. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-texas-sharpshooter

If you live in NYC and have a permit and a gun, you cannot transport that gun out of the city, no matter what reason you have for wanting to take it out of the city. That is the law being challenged here.

Are you new to the jackasses sitting behind the bench in the 3rd circuit?

Yep, that could happen, and is pretty likely actually, because it is part of the coward's playbook NY and NJ is known for, if they are going to lose, they relent in order to not set precedent. That's why Cheeseman's case is so important, because that move is out of play, they boxed NJ in.

He doesn't live in Jersey and sign away his HIPAA rights in order to purchase, that's how.

This case can pave the road though.

I'd rather they get their act together instead of having them go under, but if they do, someone competent @gunforhire? could scoop it up and turn it around, because the facility itself is very nice.

I would like to hear that story.

There are adults that are afraid of clouds. You do you, because you can't stop people from being scared shitless no matter what you do.

Another $50 in. Everyone should contribute to this.

Not surprising.

These judges are a disgrace!

Every time I have been to Shooters they have one of these in stock.

I'm always up for new places and people!

Oh, okay, you could only load them in the port. Where else were you trying to load them?

They have always only allowed one uncased firearm in the port at a time. I never saw that as an issue, but what do you mean you couldn't load your mags in the port? How were you supposed to continue shooting once a mag was empty.

What happened at Shooters? I've never had a bad experience there, and I let my membership there lapse because Range 129 is so much closer.

So @Maksim and @Smokin .50, i guess it's safe to assume you have heard zilch from Range 129 at this point?

It is not the airlock. The airlock is between the inspection room and the range. I don't think their intentions are nefarious, I just think they are ill advised bordering on full blown incompetence.

That is exactly what they did. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro