DeerSlayer

Read this article! Hudson is aware of our NJ situation, and he has wording in the bill that covers non resident permits. http://freebeacon.com/issues/national-reciprocity-bill-will-apply-non-resident-gun-carry-permits/

Florida is $114 for 5 years, NH is $100 for 4 years. But add in to FL the cost of live fire training if you don't already have that, and prints and photo plus notary on the application, and I think NH comes out on top as a better bargain.

Love the one M39 Finnish I have. Probably one of my top 5 Mosins.

These days are over I'm afraid...

Your about 5 years too late to the game for a $79 mosin. But they used to exist. Guys like me bought crates of 20 for about $1099 about a decade ago. Now I've been selling them for $300. If it's one I don't want to keep in my collection anymore. Shit I got $100 just for one of the crates they came in.

Welcome, from Sussex County too.

You left out marriage licenses... that court interpretation alone, should open up a case for a challenge on permit reciprocity.

There's a Nappen interview on GFH radio, and a chapter in his book where he dissects the law. And points out even legal possession is illegal, the law contradicts itself.

You own firearms at your "Own Peril" in NJ.

You own firearms at your "Own Peril".

Awsome! The God of the Machine, by Paterson

Nice!

From a NJ gun page on Facebook. This person has been having email correspondence with Representative Hudson, about his bill. ----------------------------------------------------------------- *copied from Facebook* Just Re-posting for new members and for those who did not see or read it the first time, Also I have two more emails out to his office and I'm awaiting his reply. Everyone the following is full detail of my email messages and replies to and from Congressman Hudson’s office. Note: other than personal info of mine in which I removed - his office's replies to me are WORD for WORD. I still feel it leaves the door open, but I don't think NJ will see his bill the way he see's his bill... Enjoy the read...............and feel free to add any thoughts....................... (me) Dec 6th 2016 8:36am Dear Congressman Hudson I'm messaging you about the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017. Love your Idea, however I have a few questions. Me along with NJSARF group and the others ask that you add a provision in the new bill that will cover Non-Resident Carry Permits . We ask this Because NJ has unconstitutional laws that in a way keep NJ residents from getting a permit, in NJ you can apply, and you could get one, but the Admin Code keeps 99.97% of NJ residents from being issued one, Now NJ resident normally get N.H. and Utah Non-resident Permits that will allow us to carry in 33 states, but since NJ does not have a reciprocity agreement with ANY state we can't carry in NJ. But your bill, will allow anyone who has a carry permit from their home state to carry in all 50 states and DC. But not NJ residents. Leaving NJ residents at risk, as you will have tons of people that travel come to our state armed, but our own residents will not be. So you Bill Needs to include, that All Non-residents Permits that are issued with a photo on the ID, will be also honored in any state. Under the 14thAmendment. (The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws) thanks please get back to me.... I also mailed a letter to his DC office that was a lot long and more detailed. (Hudson) Dec. 13th 2016 10:48 a, Hey, John – Thanks for your note. Under the bill I plan to introduce next month, a non-resident concealed carry permit will qualify. Hope this addresses your concerns. Thanks again, Richard (me) Dec. 13th 2016 10:55 am Dear Congressman Hudson Thank you for your reply, everyone in NJ has been debating about your bill, as many of us believe the wording would NOT help NJ residents with Non-Resident carry permits. But based on what you just messaged me, your bill will 100% include non-resident permits, right? (Hudson) Dec. 13th 2016 11:47 am Hey, John – That's correct - it will include non-resident permits. Thanks again, Richard (me) Dec. 14th 2016 3:03 pm Dear Congressman Hudson and or his office, I am so sorry to bother you again; however I posted on the NJ2A community page on what you told me. However after 125 likes and comments the census was that your bill will not help NJ residents. And even if it did that NJ would fight it in court for so long it would just die out anyway. The big concern is even though NJ does have a carry statue, which is one of the requirements of your bill, because of the Justifiable need code in NJ the avg. person is deprived of their 2nd amendment rights to Keep and Bear arms, outside the home. So most Guns owner in NJ have went to a carry class and got a Nonresident carry permit from say Utah. This permit will let NJ residents carry in 33 states "BUT NOT NJ", our home state. Our NJ2A community has ask me to ask you a straight forward question. Will your bill allow or force NJ to honor (NJ residents) who have a Non-Resident carry permit? Meaning will your bill let a NJ resident carry a handgun legally within NJ, by using a Non-NJ resident carry permit.,As long as the permit has a photo on it? IF not this is a 14th amendment lawsuit as non-resident of NJ would have more rights than the own citizens on NJ. I know your busy but please reply to me, Thanks John. (his office) Dec. 15, 2016 4:41pm Dear John – Thanks for reaching out. My name is Tatum and I'm Rep. Hudson's communications director. I understand your concerns and have spoken with our legislative staff. To answer your question, yes. Under the bill Rep. Hudson plans to introduce, a NJ resident can carry legally within NJ by using a non-resident carry permit with a valid identification document containing a photograph. All concealed carry permit holders must follow the laws of the state in which they are carrying concealed. I hope this answers your question. Thanks again, Tatum (me) Dec. 16th 10:32am Dear Tatum Gibson, Again on behalf of all of us, the NJ2AS and the NJ2AF and Myself we thank you and Congressman Hudson for your replies. But is there anything you can send us in writing that would state your office's claim. AS like I stated some members of our group are concerned based on the version of his bill that was released. Please let me know. John – (his office) Dec. 16, 2016 11:09 am Dear John – Here's part of the bill text we plan to introduce that should address your concerns -> “(a) Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or political subdivision thereof (except as provided in subsection (b)) and subject only to the requirements of this section), a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm, who is carrying "a" valid identification document containing "a photograph of the person", and who is carrying "a" valid license or permit which is issued pursuant to the law of a State and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm or is entitle to carry a concealed firearm in the State in which the person resides, may possess or carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, in any State, other than the State of residence or licensure of the person, that…” I hope that Helps, Tatum. (me) Dec. 16th 11:22am Dear Tatum, Thanks again, But doesn't that leave the state to interpret that differently than it is intended. In Congressman's view "If" it passes, is there a way a state LIKE NJ could decide NOT to follow the law? because of the wording in the bill can be misinterpreted? Thanks John, UPDATE: (Tatum) Dec. 16th 2016 11:46am Dear John - We have reached out to legislative counsel who has confirmed this for us. I will have my legislative staff reach out to legislative counsel again to triple check, but it is our understanding that the wording of the bill makes it crystal clear that a NJ resident can carry legally within NJ by using a non-resident carry permit with a valid identification document containing a photograph. All concealed carry permit holders must follow the laws of the state in which they are carrying concealed. Also, Gun Owners of America has said this about our bill, "Second, the Hudson bill benefits citizens of anti-gun states who get permits from pro-gun states. So if a gun owner living in “occupied” California, New Jersey, or New York gets a carry permit from Utah, then he or she will be able to carry a firearm in any state in the country!" Thanks again, Tatum https://m.facebook.com/groups/353517724790801?view=permalink&id=841106682698567

Critical Defense. State police issued an opinion that they're not hollow points at some point in time.

If he does that, he won't want any of the shotguns he's considering after shooting what we all bring. Lol

And what i was insinuating is, why ban murder when it's already banned? Seems redundant. Kinda like putting a lock on a gun that's already locked in a gun safe, that's locked inside of a house.

Next time you're house has a leaking pipe, or no heat/air, bring it to me. I offer a huge discount to anyone who does.

Same concept.

Most police stations participate in this program. They have free cable locks. http://www.projectchildsafe.org/

About 40-50K a year on my work van, maybe 5-8k on my personal vehicle on average.

That's mandatory.

Because you are running a much newer boiler, with an indirect water heater. He has a tankless coil in his boiler if memory serves. That's a 30% savings right off the bat going from a tankless to an indirect storage tank. With a tankless his boiler is always maintaining between 160-180 24/7/365. With your indirect you have no low limit. The boiler doesn't turn on and off all day to maintain temperature for instant hot water. You have 40 gallons in storage ready to go at anytime.

Those rules have been in place for decades. Long before Obama. If you're going to do your own, you do it on a weekend. And make it quick, out and back in. Shock it when your done. And play stupid if anyone asks you about it afterwards.

That's exactly what it means. Unless you're licensed and passed the EPA exam to install pumps or drill wells you can't open the well head. The reason is because people are stupid, and will drag the pipe across their lawn through dog shit, down the driveway through an oil slick, then drop the line back down the well. You're not just contaminating your well. Everyone in your neighborhood is now exposed to whatever bacteria or contamination you just introduced into the aquafer. Most Well guys have well trucks, that spool the pipe onto an empty spool on their truck then back down, so it never touches the ground. And they then shock the well with chlorine tablets.

Love the part where it says they won't even read or consider an appeal, unless you pay them first. Very nice township it sounds like. Smh...