SAPPA

Okay, But.... Since when does linking to a website establish any site as "Alex Jones Light"? And, you don't visit TPATH but know enough to evaluate and label it? Pretty impressive. We link to Drudge Report too. Sure would like to be Drudge Report Light. We link to about 20 conservative websites where we feel important information can be found. Alex Jone's InfoWars is just one of them, which by the way is as pro gun as Ammoland.com, which we also link to. Anyway, back to SAPPA. Nick and I are preparing a letter to Governor Christie. Since he has joined the Trump Campaign (a real supporter of the 2nd Amendment) we decided to get specific with him. The letter will challenge him to send out and Executive Order instructing his judges and the many police chiefs in NJ to loosen up the "show need" clause that the state has been using to prevent carry permits. He would be within his powers to "clarify any portion or section of any existing law" by use of the EO. We feel this will give him some talking points that would prove he has actually made it easier for New Jerseyans to get permits (as opposed to that little fib he told in one of his last debates), as he stumps the campaign trail with Trump. We'll let you know how we make out. Nick wanted to do this as part of the anticipated meeting that is in the works. But his joining the Trump campaign may present us with a unique opportunity to put some added pressure on him. Thanks everyone, Dwight

Amature Alex Jones???? Care to point to a specific? Doubt you can. Our website has no conspiracies, only very talented and well educated writers. Anyone who says TPATH is a conspiracy website clearly has a problem with reality or with veracity. Getting off the topic again so please send me your proof of your indictment via my TPATH email and keep this string open to SAPPA news. [email protected] Old proverb I just made up; One who speaks without facts soon speaks without listeners. Dwight

Silly comments!!!! Please notice if you will, the article I shared with you and this forum is not nor will it ever be part of any official record. This post was taken from the TPATH website where you will find many articles on various subjects. While we strive there to provide precise and accurate information it is imperative that our work is not purely clinical. As we need to be sure the reader is a little entertained and a little surprised. So fear not, when and if we need to submit a legal brief or report to a court we are very capable of doing so. If you doubt this, please check out the motions, letters and briefs we have submitted to the court over this past year. Those documents would put most people to sleep if they had not already reached for the mouse after the first few paragraphs. I suspect that would include you too. I do appreciate your suggestion but I think I'll continue writing for TPATH in the manner that has brought us 20 thousand unique visitors a week. Dwight Kehoe Editor of www.tpath.org

Yes, the meeting took place. Nick has asked that we keep the details of this under wraps a bit longer as there is now under way an effort, as a result of that meeting, to meet with a very high ranking official in Christie's administration. Please be patient on this. They may be blowing smoke, but we need to take every opportunity that may present itself. Thanks, Dwight

Hey All, We prepared an update in the form of an online report. It is too long to post here. Please follow this link to the SAPPA pages to see it. See the report here http://www.tpath.org/what-are-they-afraid-of-.html This is a tough struggle. But we have a tough guy taking on these ideologues. The court would love to put this case to bed. But they appear scared to take the step. Thanks all, Dwight

NOTICE on the lawsuit ruling. They once again did not rule. No notice, no statement, no digital filing. Nick called them today, the court clerk had no comment and refused to let him talk to the Judge's Clerk. Clearly the court fears making a ruling as they know they will be included in the appeal and then will have to support it. Thanks, Dwight Plus....... Response to the gentleman who wants Cruz. I'm not about to get into a back and forth over who is best for President. Except to say if we are supporters of the Constitution, we must support all of it. Whether or not it suits us. Please check out this video. If you still think Cruz is eligible, that will be your prerogative. https://vimeo.com/154765379 If this link doesn't work here you can see it on the front page of www.tpath.org Again, we are all on the same side of most issues and for sure there will be disagreements on some things. I have spent much time looking into Article II since before Obama was elected. I am convinced that both Cruz and Rubio are ineligible. Like I said, this topic is not meant for this discussion and I don't think we should tie it up with this issue. Please email me at [email protected] and we can discuss it a bit more or you can give me reasons why you disagree with the professor in the video Linked here.

Hi All, I probably did not make two points clear. First: The court does not call a press conference or even make a public announcement. Remember they refused to allow anyone to be present when they make the ruling. This means that Judge Shipp probably does nothing more then send his paperwork to the court clerk who will post it into the electronic digital system. Since they wanted NIck to pay $1,200.00 for the privilege to send and receiving court papers and we did not have the money for that, Nick will be notified by mail. I asked Nick if he could call the court and he said that they most likely would not give that info over the phone. He has his meeting with the Assemblyman today at 9:30am. After that, if the Assemblyman does not have the ruling info, Nick will try to call the court. Anything we find out we will post here right away. Second: We fully expect this court to rule against us. As we have said many times, they will find some underhanded trick in support of the dismissal, one that will not have any legal bite to it. This will be plugged into our appeal which is ready to go except for the fact that we don't know yet the reason Shipp will give for the dismissal. On another point, Scalia's untimely death is not good news for our case. Even if the Republicans hold strong and wait for the next president (which I hope will be Trump) to appoint there is a certain amount of worry that the new Justice will be what we hope or expect. (RE: Souter-Roberts, both Bush family appointees) That's all for today. Will keep you posted. Promise! Dwight & Nick

Siderman, I'll have to answer that question after Wed's meeting. Dwight

Hey Everyone, Wanted to remind you that today is the day Judge Shipp is supposed to rule on Purpura V Christie and the several motions both Nick and the state's defendants have filed. It has been almost a full year since we first filed this case. We believe that they delay was instigated by the complete and thorough motions Nick and I prepared. That isn't to say we think for one moment that the Judge will rule the defendants in default, even though by every standard and every federal rule, they are. We fully expect him to side with leftist ideology and dismiss our case on the weakest of grounds. Some of which will no doubt be comical. Nick and I have been working on the appeal for this anticipated ruling and we will be filing it in the 3rd circuit court of appeals before the ink has dried on the dismissal. On another front in this battle we have sent a letter (several weeks ago) to Governor Christie where we asked him a simple question. That was, if you Sir, are so much in support of the 2nd Amendment, as you say in the debates, why are you spending tax payer's dollars defending those whom have worked to destroy it? The letter finished by asking him for a sit down meeting with NIck, whereby there may be some room to negotiate and get this problem put to bed. As anticipated we have not heard from the good Governor's office but there is something in the wind. An assemblyman, we want to keep his name out of this for awhile, has contacted Nick and wants a meeting. That meeting will be tomorrow Wednesday, the day after the scheduled ruling. Curious, no? We will notify you guys and gals, here, when we get the official notice from the court and if anything of substance comes out of the meeting on Wed. That's all for now. We will be posting (on the SAPPA Pages) the above mentioned letter to Christie as well as any official paperwork issued to us by the court. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and (mostly) kind remarks Warm regards, Dwight & Nick

Hey All, Here is an article the SAPPA Group released this week. It is a bit of a clue as to what we are up to that was alluded to in last week's update notice. http://www.tpath.org/national-media-hate-christie.html Thanks, Dwight Nick

Hey All, As promised here is an update on the Petition. Early on when we first filed the Brief, we got a terse response from Judge Stark which indicated he thought he was too big, too high up on the mankind scale to be bothered with trivial lawsuits from the peons. He must have seen something that changed his mind because we just received a motion to Dismiss from his Attorney this past week. ???? Of course this filing is just as untimely and infirm as those from the other defense teams, but once again it appears that Court will accept it's filing. So Nick and I have prepared an Opposition filing to Stark's Motion. Here is a pasting from our Log and update page with associated links to the documents. SATURDAY, JANUARY 23, 2016 - This past week, on January 14, 2016, Nick received a very late in the game Motion to Dismiss from Defense Team of Judge Stark, one of the Defendants named in the Brief. The question begs, why have they waited so long to put this motion in? Why not months ago when the other Defense Counsels submitted theirs? Only they know why, but it's pretty clear they waited to the last minute anticipating that Mr. Purpura would not have time to review and then prepare a response before the scheduled Ruling Date which has been set for February 16, 2016. However, once again they have underestimated Nick's expertise and preparedness. Understanding that Stark had yet to provide a Motion, understanding too that his defense would pretty much mirror the lame defense of the other Counsels, which it did, he was ready for them, before they even filed. Making the anticipated adjustments, Nick and Dwight had a formal response ready in just three days. That response has now been filed with the District Court in Trenton along with a cover letter. You can see Nick's Opposition to Stark's Motion to Dismiss on the Documents page where you will also be able to see Stark's filings. Please take some time to read what we have prepared for the Court and once again you will see why they appear to be worried about making illegal rulings in support of the Defendants. We are not saying that the Judge will not rule that way, but we are convinced they are worried about the repercussions of doing so. Thanks everyone, we are getting close to a decision from this court. The fireworks will begin if the Judge makes an illegal ruling, which we totally expect he will. Judge Shipp as you know was appointed by Obama and last week another Federal Judge, appointed by Obama ruled against the usurper in another case. So, who knows, there may be a slight chance Judge Shipp will do the right thing. In a few weeks we will know. Also Nick has initiated an unusual process and procedure which involves Governor Christie. We cannot say just now what that is, until we see the results of it. However, if it does not pan out, we will post everything having to do with it on TPATH and of course here in the Forum. Regards to all our friends and supporters of this action, Dwight and Nick

Hi Everyone, Hope you all had a good holiday season and were able to spend some quality time during Christmas and New Years with your family and friends. This posting is being done for two purposes. The first is report the latest additions to the SAPPA Group Activity log. The second is to ask for those who are signed up for this string, to do what they can to get more NJGF people to follow this. Things are about to break and our next steps will need as many people as possible to help us get the word out to the public. Thanks for taking this request under consideration, Here is the latest update on the SAPPA Activity log: MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 2016 - It has been awhile since this log has been updated. That is not however, because nothing has been happening. Nick and the SAPPA Group have been busy. As of last week we have been notified by the 3rd Circuit Court that they have received the Writ of Mandamus (see below) and the associated filings. The notice informed Nick that the Writ has been accepted and a date will be scheduled for a hearing. This hearing will no doubt come after the scheduled ruling date due on February 16, 2016 by Judge Shipp and the District Court. The US Post Office notified us that the Writ of Mandamus and the associated Affidavits had been delivered to the Third Circuit Court in Philadelphia on December 28, 2015. Nick received notice from the Circuit Court that the Writ has been received and Docketed for adjudication on January 5, 2016 and that a Case Number had been issued. CASE NUMBER 15-4067 The District Court was issued notification of the Writ and that court was given until January 19, 2016 to acknowledge its receipt and to inform the court who will be representing the District Court in this legal action. As we all know the District Court's ruling date is the latest of many which have been scheduled then delayed. It is very possible that Judge Shipp having been notified by the upper court, the Circuit Court, that a Writ of Mandamus has been filed against him and the activities of his court, Mr. Purpura believes that Judge Shipp will be under great pressure to finally rule on Purpura V. Christie and without further delay. Even though there is no existing regulation or court ruling that would legally allow Judge Shipp to rule against Mr. Purpura, it is very unlikely he will not. In this day and time, ideology trumps the Constitution and Federal law. So in that light, we have the rough draft of our appeal to the Third Circuit, ready. All that remains is to plug in any statements made by the Judge in his anticipated Dismissal ruling that Mr. Purpura has not foreseen or to remove any that the Judge does not state. There will be a need for final editing of the Appeal and we should be ready to file it within two days of Judge Shipp's ruling. For those who have been following this from the beginning you will see that it has been almost a year now since Chaplain Nicholas Purpura filed the Brief. Clearly these people are concerned about how they should rule and if they will be held accountable for ruling unconstitutionally and contrary to Federal law. And Nick has promised them, they will be. WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2015- This update will encompass many issues and events which have occurred during the past (9) nine days. The Writ of Mandamus discussed below has been completed and filed with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The support documents filed with this legal action can be viewed and downloaded here>>> 1. The Writ of Mandamus 2. Exhibit A 3. Affidavit in support of Writ claims 4. Petition for filing Forma Pauperis Mr. Purpura received a Court Docketed notice of the latest date scheduled for a ruling to be made on the several Motions before Judge Shipp. This new scheduled date is about the 3rd or 4th, all of which have been canceled. It is possible that the letter which was sent to Judge Shipp on December 7, 2015, which demanded the delays be halted and suggested there would be legal action taken if the court continued to protract this litigation, may well have been the impetus for them to at least put a show on that they were moving along. The other ruling dates which were canceled or ignored refused Mr. Purpura's request to present oral arguments. This latest docketed notification also refuses Nick his Constitutional right to be heard. Again we have been informed that the ruling will be made without the benefit of opposing views being heard. <end report> Also remember that you can always go to http://www.tpath.org/sappa-news-and-reports.html to see the latest. If you want to help get others involved, that link should bring the newly interested up to date. Thanks again to all you wonderful people who care about not just our 2nd Amendment rights but the Constitution as a whole. Warm regards, Dwight & Nick

Hey All,, We have been very busy with a few different plans being put into action. Here is a link to the latest. http://www.tpath.org/phony-pretenders.html Be sure to check out the SAPPA log. Thanks everyone, have safe and Happy New Year. Dwight & Nick

ELITISM???? I work more than 60 hours each week on this problem, trying to come up with something that could once and for all keep the government out of our lives, as much as is humanly possible. I have been doing this for several years now. And because I don't agree with everything a few of you guys are putting out, I'm a disgusting elitist????? One last thing before my final exit. No one has ever been adjudicated a felon for mistakenly overdrawing a checking account. Habitually and continuously, perhaps. And this terrorist watch list a few of you are so worried about being on. If they are watching you, whether or not we ever do get the NCR System in place, and you are on that list, the background check system will find you. Anyway, have at it, have at each other, but this elitist is bailing out. I'm disconnecting from this thread. Thanks to all those who have stood with me and understanding my intentions. I really do appreciate all of you. Dwight

And my final comment on NCRA............ I don't know how to make it more clear to you gentlemen who fear this, that the felonies which will get someone put into the database will be related to violent acts. We made it very clear in the descriptive writings located on the SAPPA and NCRA web pages that these things still need to be worked out by committees as they prepare this bill for a vote. You all need to remember this bill we put together is only a concept and not the final polished stone. And for those who get sickened by the thought of the 1.5 million people (where that number came from I have no idea) who might be on the terror watch list, the panel would also need to discuss in detail exactly what it is that gets one on that list. Again, no one would agree to putting people on there who write letters to editors or who might have a controversial website. (If that were the case I'd be on the top of that list) My latest article is a good example of this: http://www.tpath.org/common-sense.html And finally for all those who like how the background system now works, how many anal exams law abiding citizens must get before they can purchase a firearm, how many data bases, both state and federal which list all your weapons, all your ammo and where you live, fear not, because you are very likely to keep that system. The NCRA will never be permitted by leftists and a few not so left. As I stated above this will be the last comment I make on this. It is evident that some will never understand the value of tracking dangerous felons as opposed to tracking law abiding gun owners. Sometimes a great meal is less attractive and tasty because someone put some cauliflower on our plate. But in the long run, the cauliflower might prove to be a healthy addition. I will however, continue to record ideas generated by you guys to put into the bill before we begin sending it out to Congressmen and US Senators. There have been some excellent suggestions. Dwight

Latest update on the Brief TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2015- Following the letter to Chief Judge Simandle several phone calls were made to his office inquiring as to the status of Nick's request for him to look into the proceedings of this case. Typical and not unexpected, no one there would make a commitment to any statement as to whether the Chief Judge had even seen the letter yet. We will continue to call them and will update any information we get, when we get it. On the other front, the delay by Judge Shipp's Court regarding rulings or information has been, to say the least, unacceptable. As a result, we have prepared yet another letter to Judge Shipp informing him that this delay has gone on way too long and is beginning to border upon obstruction of justice. Please read that letter here: Letter to Judge Shipp December 1, 2015 Our next step may will be to file a "Writ of Mandamus". If and when we decide to do that we will fill everyone in on what it is and what it might accomplish. Thanks, Dwight

My gosh people, Don't you understand that if you own a gun, you are already on a list? Don't you understand that every time you file for a permit, your privacy is invaded and recorded? The NCRA will do away with that. All of it. No one will be on the list that sickens some of you unless you have been convicted of a felony or adjudicated to be mentally unstable. Can't you understand that the government is tracking you now and this bill could end them tracking you and just track the bad guys? It is no more complicated or sickening than that. I'll have nothing else to say in this. I find it hard to believe some of you can't see a healthy tree through the foggy forest of fear. Dwight

Well, as they say in show business, which I am of course not any part of, "this is a tough crowd". Okay, so rather than go over one by one the many and varied ideas and contentions presented by you guys I have decided to let you all have at it for awhile. But in the meantime here are a few facts and reasons for the implementation of the NCRA (National Criminal Registry Act) 1. No system where any government, federal, state or local which interferes with our rights or invades our privacy, is a good one. 2. The system in place now, at least here in NJ and many other states, does all of that in spades. 3. The system in place now keeps information on gun owners by means invading every orifice of our lives. 4. The NCRA will not store information on any but the criminals, the insane and terrorists. 5. The NCRA will end the handgun permit policy as well as the ridiculous one gun limit. 6. Everyone in their right mind knows that it is impossible to stop bad people from doing bad things with firearms. The NCRA will be more effective at that than the system in place now and it will do it by tracking bad guys, not good guys. 7. It is easy and quite realistic to fret about and worry about whom and how they are put on the terrorist watch list because this government as it stands now and for a big part as it has always stood, can't be trusted. But we need to face reality. The reality that there are bad people and we as individuals do not have the capacity to find and identity them. The states as of now report crimes which have been finalized tot he Federal Government. They do this each month. The NCRA would require that they also report names of convicted felons, in categories which will need to be detailed, to the NCR System. Only if an appeal is won by an individual will his name be removed from the system. 8. The NCRA gives anyone the chance to challenge why they are on this list, for any of the three reasons. That is more than honest citizens have now with the intrusive and secret data gathering system. 9. The NCRA calls for a panel equally balanced between the parties. Remember, just as all Republicans are not gun supporters there are some Democrats who are. It would not be naive to think this system could or would be fair to anyone whom challenges his status in it. 10. The gun grabbers are made up of two groups. The brainwashers (progressive government people) and the brainwashed (fools who have been bred to fear all firearms). It would be virtually impossible to return to the days when anyone could carry a weapon or buy a weapon. It must be admitted to that some sort of system to prevent dangerous people from buying guns from dealers is needed. The NCRA does that by tracking bad guys and leaves you and your privacy alone. 11. The NCRA will do away with waiting periods. Instantly the system will clear a purchase if the buyer is not in the system. 12. As we said earlier, the NCRA that we produced was done with much thought and that it, at this point is only that, a concept. So many very intricate details need to be ironed out before an actual bill could be voted on. 13. For anyone to say they wouldn't support this bill, out of hand, for one reason or another, that person will have decided that the system we have now is okay with them. To end the system in place now, we need a viable alternative that will not give the gun grabbers ammunition to stop it. For sure they will contest anything that allows honest people to purchase firearms and to do so without being under their control. But there will be no way for them to say that having a list of bad guys is not better than investigating every American citizen who wants to own a weapon. 14. So if you like what you have now, if we do nothing, you can keep it. 15.However, if you think that it has some merit, draw up your own bill and send it to us. We will be ready to put all the information we get together into a new bill. But, in the meantime I find it difficult to believe that it would be a bad thing to get this concept into the public's eye as well as the politicians who would need to sponsor and support it. We know the "devil is in the detail" but we also know the devil in this current system plans to do nothing but grow in strength. Okay, get your bills to me, but understand if you water it down too much, it will die a quiet death. One of the many reason why we have a need to defend ourselves with firearms is because there are dangerous people living amongst us. Every honest American should be on board with a system that will do as much as it can, under the guidance of the Constitution, to prevent bad guys from arming themselves via the legal gun dealers and traders. Warm regards to you all, Dwight

Hi All, Nick will be making a follow up call to the Chief Judge on Monday morning. I will post any information we get from that call and fill you in on the first call he made earlier this week. Also, as you know we expect there to be a time delay after the ruling, whether we win or lose the case it will be headed to the 3rd Circuit. In the meantime I thought some of you might be interested in seeing the Federal legislation we are working to get sponsored in either the House or the US Senate. Today Donald Trump released a position paper on the Second Amendment. It's powerful and terrific. I am most pleasantly surprised at the strength of his position. He mentioned the revamping of the background check system. Our proposed bill does that and more. I sent him a link to it, but the chances of his people even seeing it are quite small. Anyhow, if you take a minute and read the proposal and you like it or have comments on it, let us know. And of course if you do like it and want to help get this out to Congressmen and Senators, please have at it. Here is a link to the National Criminal Registry Act : http://www.tpath.org/ncra-documents.html I can be downloaded in PDF . Until Monday evening, take care. Karen, Nick and I hope you all had a great and safe Thanksgiving. Dwight

Hey all, On Monday Nick made a call to the office of the Chief Judge in Camden concerning our request to investigate the Court Clerk in Trenton District Court. As usual they tried to give him the run around, but as usual he managed to squeeze information out of them that they reluctantly had to give. Until we get confirmation on what that Court intends to do we have to keep details of that conversation out of the public. We will be posting more on this on Monday afternoon. I'll drop a message here when that gets done. Regards, Dwight

Hi All, The follow up outreach from you guys on this video thing is very nice. Thanks, We have been working many hours and have lots of irons in the fire. As a result I may have responded to the critiques in a manner that they didn't deserve. For that I wish to step back a bit, I know every one of you are on the right side of this. I have discussed this with Nick and we decided, in the effort to do things as best we can, under the circumstances we are working in, to redo the video using a human voice. One of our WPE members has told me he knows a professional voice over guy who would do the oration for free. I have already sent him the text file. If we use it I will have lots of work to sync the new up with the old. Also Golf Battery has volunteered to do a voice over for us. That would be super. So if you can do that please do. I would be more acceptable to using one of us here in the forum than I would the guy my buddy has suggested. Anyone on this forum is welcome to send in his efforts. Please email me at [email protected] and I will send you the narrative file. On another subject we have just posted an article on the meaning of the Second Amendment. You might find my research and take on it interesting. http://www.tpath.org/the-militia-the-people-the-colon.html ============ Thanks again, Dwight

Well, seems we have been taken to the woodshed. A little note on the production of the video and a general remark concerning all the criticism of it. This video that some people and their wives so dislike, is actually the second generation of it. The first one we used my voice and I hated every word and syllable I uttered. The microphone I used was a high quality one, but the the speaker, me, not so much. The SAPPA Group does not have money to hire a professional videographer and an experienced orator so, as with everything we have done on this project over the past 3 years, we did it ourselves. We did seek out Obama, he's such a fine speaker, but he was busy kissing Muslim ass. We found that even though we have posted, step by step, everything we have done to date on the websitet, we were still getting questions which had been answered or displayed on the web site. The idea of the voice over video with associated graphics, quietly and calmly explaining the law suit, where it has been and where it is headed, seemed like a good idea. Easier to sit back for a few minutes and listen than it is to read through the multiple letters and motions we have filed. For those who were more interested in being entertained than they were about this process and the battle we are waging for your rights, it is really quite disheartening to know that the over 100 hours of graphic work, writing the text, transforming it into a voice file and syncing the subject to the graphic could not hold your interest for more than 5 seconds, I suggest maybe you might prefer watching some reruns of Gunsmoke. Exciting, its got guns and as opposed to our video, some of them are quite entertaining. Finally, it might be interesting to note that out of the almost 100 people, since we posted it Wed, who viewed or partially viewed because of instant boredom, most of the comments were positive. In fact the only negative remarks came from this forum. Finally, I would like to promise that any future informational presentations will be more entertaining, But I won't because I don't lie. I'll still post updates and progress reports here but if we produce another monotonous, boring video presentation, most likely you won't find a link to it here. Regards, Dwight

I just went to my Youtube page. They will not allow the editing of an existing title. I would have to remove the video and re-upload it. That would then change the url and those that are passing it to other people by that url will not be able to connect. So, I'm sorry for the f to g typo. But we are going to have to live with it. I'll take my lashes with the old wet noodle. Thanks all, Dwight

Hi, We noticed the typo (og instead of of) awhile ago. I'll get to it as soon as I can. But in the meantime, if you do a Youtube search with "In Support of the Bill of Rights" our video comes up. But thanks, I will fix the typo soon. Dwight

Hey All, Just finished a meeting with Nick and a few SAPPA Group members. We decided to spend a few days trying to get the video we produced to talk show hosts or anyone who might have some connection to the public. For those of you who may not know, the video has been re-edited and we think it has a compelling message that should be seen by as many people as possible. As of now we have not asked anyone in this forum for anything but tonight that is going to change. My partners asked me to ask you guys to take the link to this video and spread it far and wide. But that is not all, we need some vols who are willing to call the Court Clerk for Judge Shipp and ask her, her name is Kim, if she would get the link to the video to the Judge. We also need someone to do the same for the Chief Judge Simandle, we do not know at this time what his clerk's name is. All of us in the SAPPA Group have been in Trenton, had our names associated with the law suit often enough that if we tried to get this video link to them it might be considered as attempting to influence the Court. That is why we need volunteers who are not members of SAPPA to do this. If you haven't seen the revamped video check it out here; It can also be found doing a YouTube search "In Support of the Bill of Rights" So if anyone or all of you want to help in this effort here is an example of what you could say when you call. "I have been following the lawsuit Purpura v. Christie in blogs and various websites when I ran across a video. I thought to myself after watching it that the Judge handling this case should see it. That's why I'm calling to ask you if you think the Judge would be interested in seeing it." Of course anything you wish to add or if your approach would be different, that would be fine. Any effort would be beneficial. Nick understands its not a pleasant thing dealing with most of these people on the phone, he endures it often. lol Here is the contact information: Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle [Camden] 856 757 5139 Judge Micheal A. Shipp (Trenton) 609 989 2065 Judge Shipp's Clerk is Kim (She is quite nice, we have spoken to her on several occasions) Okay, that's our request to you guys and gals. If you want to contact us or have any questions or wish to report what you could do send an email to [email protected] Thanks again, Dwight and Nick PS Even if you can't help with this let me know what you think of the reworked video.