MauserCollector

Yes I am rushing to my parents house to watch with them. Big transfer news. Did they release the fee? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

These were rifles not handguns. Specifically Mosins and Mausers Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

It was really addressed to 3 people. That they defended Trump's Kavanaugh pick and got bent out of shape of any criticism of Trump, but they ignore his Bennett pick for the 9th. Bennett is an Anti. The 9th needs strong Pro 2A. Hopefully he isn't confirmed but the Justice Committee and Cloture vote last night doesn't look good. He will likely be confirmed to the 9th. My point about those 3 is why aren't they defending his pick of Bennet too. Then again the more I think about it I guess it is because not as many are as Pro 2A as they claim to be. Thank you for helping me see even more of the light. Too many NJ firearms owners simply are not Pro 2A. Thus why it is not worth fighting the fight here. I know my decision to leave is the right one. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He isn't keeping to the list. He is keeping to the updated swamp added Bush-Clinton Cabal List. Get out your tinfoil hats. Kavanaugh helped in covering up Vince Foster murder. He is a card carrying Cabal Swamp member. https://heavy.com/news/2018/07/brett-kavanaugh-vince-foster-vincent-death/ Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk No because there is no argument about Bennett, he is an Anti. So what is anyone to say that is defending the Kavanaugh pick? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hopefully next is a true Conservative POTUS like Cruz. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Though Trump did campaign on being strong Pro 2A. Like a dummy I actually believed him. Others still do or they make excuses for his lies. I believe you never did believe him. You were right. I was wrong. So if we are going to have a lying POTUS might as well have a proven strong Conservative like Cruz or Pence who are both strong Pro 2A. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

See edit above Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No I don't believe you are. Those Always Trumpers get mad and bent out of shape at the mere mention that Trump screwed up. I agree better than Obama and better than Hillary, but not what we were promised. Swamp not drained, 2A not restored, Obamacare not replaced by Association Healthplans across State Lines, Budget not balanced (in fact just the opposite). Wars still on going. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Actually it does if Bennett isn't confirmed, and replaced by Pro 2A pick. Right now there are 16 Dem Nominees one is retiring. There are 6 GOP. There are 29 spots. Trump can fill 8. Making it 15-14. One more Dem retires and it is GOP majority. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

How come the Trump can do no wrong crowd hasn't touched his nominee Mark Bennett to the 9th Circuit?? Cat got your tongues? Is it possible Trump isn't the big 2A Supporter many think he is? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I don't like the trend. First Bennett to 9th then Kavanaugh to SCOTUS. I really fear Garland would be his pick to replace RBG. I fear even more the RINOS would confirm him like they are going to do with Bennett. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I guess I should have used originalist. Meaning there is nothing about licensing in 2A. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Wasn't meant as name calling. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I said basically what you did but not as nice. We got Kennedy 2.0 not Thomas' equal. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Ok so you aren't a Constitutionalist. Why not just say that Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Kavanaugh said machine gun ban is ok. Laws restricting not common use firearms is ok. Laws restricting magazines is ok if the commons use is say 10 rounds. Laws requiring licensing and testing to carry is ok. Maybe you are ok with those bans. I am not. Hardiman said NJ carry not ok. Hardiman said taking away gun rights for non violent felons is not ok. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

You get that from this? Judge Kavanaugh explained that Heller authorized many gun controls: Indeed, Heller largely preserved the status quo of gun regulation in the United States. Hellerestablished that traditional and common gun laws in the United States remain constitutionally permissible. The Supreme Court simply pushed back against an outlier local law—D.C.'s handgun ban—that went far beyond the traditional line of gun regulation. As Helleremphasized: "Few laws in the history of our Nation have come close to the severe restriction of the District's" law. 554 U.S. at 629.

Can you show me where common use is a factor in the Second Amendment Right to keep and bear arms? You left out this part (By contrast, fully automatic weapons, also known as machine guns, have traditionally been banned and may continue to be banned after Heller.) Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Read all of it. Especially the common use parts and the magazine limits. No chance he would overturn Hughes Amendment. I don't even think he would overturn NJ carry laws. He is a big proponent of stare decisis. So Roe v Wade he will not go against. At the same time separate but equal was ok to overturn? Can't have it both ways. Bad decisions need to be corrected. I disagree with some of Heller as well. Scalia was going soft like all Justices except Thomas do in their old age. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Thank you. I actually bothered to read the opinions before commenting on Kavnanaugh which it is clear many did not. Though even after they read it they will still say it was the best choice because the NY Liberal is a God to them. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk So Supreme Court Justices can pick their successors? To hell with the Constitution right? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I respectfully disagree. We play the compromise game while Dems stick together and never compromise. They get their way even when GOP is in power. Worst case we had to wait for after the midterms to confirm Hardiman. Best case now is Kavanaugh doesn't get confirmed and Hardiman gets confirmed after the midterms. My post you quoted was sarcasm. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

We know where Hardiman stood on NJ carry laws. He is a consistent supporter of gun rights, writing a dissenting opinion arguing the Court should have struck down on Second Amendment grounds a New Jersey law limiting handgun carry permits to people showing a “justifiable need” to carry handguns in public. He also sided with two plaintiffs challenging a federal law banning felons and some misdemeanants from owning guns; he did not argue that the whole law was unconstitutional, but contended that because the two plaintiffs were only convicted of nonviolent misdemeanors (corrupting a minor and carrying a handgun without a permit, respectively), a ban that applies to them overly burdens Second Amendment rights. Adam Winkler, a law professor at UCLA and expert on Second Amendment issues, has described Hardiman as a “Second Amendment extremist” who would vote to strike down gun control laws in states like California and New York if put on the Supreme Court. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That makes even more sense. Thank you for that info. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Trump of course, but I would rather be voting for Cruz or Pence. That line of thought in your question by the way is settling. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I didn't know the 2nd was changeable by history of Unconstitutional Laws. Always thought it needed to be ratified. Learned something new. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The official list was of 25 of which Kavanaugh was added to the initial 20 after I'm sure the Bush people had a say. The supposed final 6 interviewed were Appeals court judges Brett Kavanaugh, Raymond Kethledge, Amy Coney Barrett, Amul Thapar, Joan Larsen and Thomas Hardiman. In addition to Kavanuagh not being on the initial list of 20 The other new names on Trump's list are Amy Coney Barrett, a former Notre Dame law professor just confirmed last month to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit; Kevin Newsom, confirmed in August to a seat on the 11th Circuit court of appeals; Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt Grant, a former state solicitor general; and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick, also a former state solicitor general. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/11/17/trump-adds-five-names-list-potential-supreme-court-justices/875983001/ Hardiman was on the initial list of 20. Those were names fully vetted and approved by Conservative organizations. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk