Sniper

We are getting close to this:

Actually, I had send a few photos over to AirGraphix to get a ballpark estimate, and they came back reasonable, so I was going to contact them. Plus, they're relatively close by, so that's a plus too. There aren't a lot of companies around doing this stuff.

That's exactly what I've been wrestling with. I believe the paint will last longer, the question is, I don't know how long I'll be owning this thing. If the novelty wears off after a few years, and I sell it, then longevity isn't an issue. If, for some crazy way, I keep it for 10+ years, then paint sounds like the better route. Although, Screwball said they have a truck wrapped in 2011 that's still OK.. Maybe the type of vinyl used makes a difference? Time for some additional homework.

That was really helpful information. I'm planning on doing the exterior of a new RV, so it won't come close to the daily activity, driving and manhandling like your work truck gets. My concern is all the cutting and fitting around windows, hatches, vents and if they end up being an area that makes it easier for the wrap to start peeling. If the wrap lasts at least 5 years, that wouldn't be half bad. My other choice is to get it custom painted, then put some cosmetic vinyl decals on it, thinking that the paint might last longer than the wrap. But I'd still be dealing with how the vinyl decals age, peel or fade. From some ballpark estimates, it's sounds like the paint is a lot more expensive than the wrap. Any idea what that guy charged to wrap your trucks?

Well, that's assuming she inherits all his belongings per his Will. I'll assume she does, unless there's other stipulations in his Will (previous marriage, kids, pets, etc.).

Thanks for that info. What type of longevity have you seen from the wraps before they start to peel or fade? I know they're not designed for long term, but how many years seems to be average?

Anyone on the forum do that type of work or know anyone else that does? I'm looking to get a RV either wrapped or getting all the vinyl decals redone. Alternatively, even doing a custom repainting of the exterior might fit the bill.

That's true, they were trafficking a bunch of young girls. The cops went after like 9 or 10 different spas and were watching them for a while. There were a whole bunch of locals besides big fish like Kraft vacuumed up. https://www.tcpalm.com/story/news/local/2019/02/22/new-england-patriots-owner-robert-kraft-charged-soliciting-prostitution-florida-spa/2939429002/

Ha.. A millionaire gets nailed when spending $75 for a happy ending... Some of his rich buddies also got vacuumed up in this raid. John Childs, an investment guy and John Havens, an ex COO of Citibank.

Oh boy, there goes the smile on his face... Doesn't sound like he'll be so happy for a while... New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, one of the most powerful men in American football, was charged today on two counts of soliciting prostitution in connection to a recent law enforcement bust on massage parlors in Florida that, according to law enforcement, were used for prostitution and human trafficking. The news comes a few weeks after the Patriots won their sixth Super Bowl and days after Kraft appeared at the NBA All-Star game. In a press conference Friday morning, Jupiter Police chief Daniel Kerr said Kraft was charged with two counts of soliciting prostitution, and that a warrant for his arrest is with the state’s attorney’s office and will be sent to Kraft’s home in Massachusetts. Kerr said there is video evidence of Kraft involved in sex acts in a massage parlor on two occasions. Twenty-five people total were charged with soliciting prostitution at the Orchids of Asia spa in Jupiter. https://deadspin.com/patriots-owner-bob-kraft-charged-with-soliciting-prosti-1832807440

http://fortune.com/2019/02/01/genetic-testing-consumer-dna-familytreedna-fbi/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/nation-now/2018/04/27/ancestry-genealogy-dna-test-privacy-golden-state-killer/557263002/

Looks like a great place for radio controlled boats.

Actually, I have a SR9C, so I was considering this carbine, just so I could share mags. I get so pissed off every time I buy a new piece of "equipment" that I have to buy new mags for it too. It's a real PITA.

You should go ask Alexa (who's listening all the time) what she feels about this privacy.

His list was pretty complete, he did his homework.

If you recall, that already happened, but it was a group of Repub lawmakers at a softball practice a year or so ago. I believe the shooter was a Bernie Sanders supporter.

Yep, instead of saying the dog ate your paperwork, they'll just say it got lost in cyber space.

I convinced wifey to go out the inlet ONCE... After that, she said never again. Depending on what tide is running at the time, that inlet can be more fun then Great Adventure!

So you think there is no political divide and they can't be considered "republican or democrat jurists"? That their political leaning has no affect on their rulings? ..."Even then, they diligently avoid political topics. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes a different approach. These days, she is making no secret of what she thinks of a certain presidential candidate. “I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” she said. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-no-fan-of-donald-trump-critiques-latest-term.html So, there's no chance her political beliefs have any bearing on her decisions? More from that link: ...." It was a credit to the eight-member court that it deadlocked only four times, she said, given the ideological divide between its liberal and conservative wings, both with four members. " That sounds a little bit different than "philosophical". It certainly sounds that way, doesn't it?

When you get down in the weeds and start nitpicking individual words, instead of considering the complete premise of the argument, well....

Wouldn't that be called "politics"?

Now we're going to play semantic word games? Wow.

It's not? Then it should be cut and dry, following existing laws and the Constitution. Why haven't they? In the last ten years, the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to grant review in at least 88 Second Amendment cases where lower courts upheld gun safety laws. By repeatedly declining to review lower court decisions that upheld federal, state, and local gun laws, the Supreme Court has reconfirmed that the Amendment is not an obstacle to the laws that keep our communities safe from gun violence. Since 2008, there have been over 1,310 Second Amendment cases challenging gun laws nationwide, with an overwhelming majority—nearly 93%—of the lower court decisions upholding those laws. Many of these Second Amendment challenges to gun laws make their way to the Supreme Court. However, the Court has refused to hear these cases,1 leaving lower court decisions upholding the laws intact and keeping strong gun laws on the books. https://lawcenter.giffords.org/protecting-strong-gun-laws-the-supreme-court-leaves-lower-court-victories-untouched/ Think any of those lower court rulings had any political bias attached to them?

That's the whole point, they play politics MORE than play Constitution. Thanks for proving my point. Duh...... So why haven't they taken on hardly any 2A cases the past decade, if they give zero fucks... hmmmmmm..