Sniper

I bought a brand new, throw away black rifle as a kit, a Anderson lower and a Palmetto upper, for like $420. It was supply and demand, and the "Perception of Quality", and the fear of missing out that caused prices to climb a few years ago. I remember right after the Sandy Hook shooting, standard black rifles were selling fro close to $2000, if you could find one. The funny thing, this new $420 throw away black rifle fires 223 rounds just like those $2000 rifles. I always buy new, just because, and I'm worth it!

They certainly do. Here's on on a lagoon with a dock. Only $139K https://www.realtorbobm.com/listing/21746767-19-compass-road-waretown-nj-08758/

Someone should email this to him:

Wait, what.... it's not pink camo... what's going on there?????

So, wouldn't the easy solution be, just order from the ones that don't require the FID? and this is what it said: If you don't like their policy, take your business elsewhere. It's a free country (sort of).

Any chance it's because the shipping address doesn't match your FID address and credit card address?

For your laugh of the day (and see the delusions of the Democrats) make sure everyone reads the Comment section of the article.... The cluelessness never sleeps in NJ...

The Democrats are going out of their minds!!!! A rush to block downloadable plans for 3-D printed guns On Monday, nine states and the District of Columbia filed a joint lawsuit in federal court in Seattle calling on the Trump administration to stop the plans from being posted, and seeking a nationwide temporary restraining order. The action was filed by Bob Ferguson, the attorney general of Washington State, who said, "If the Trump administration won't keep us safe, we will." Joining were attorneys general from California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon and Pennsylvania. President Trump said on Tuesday that these guns did not "seem to make much sense." https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/31/a-rush-to-block-downloadable-plans-for-3-d-printed-guns.html

2C:39-3. Prohibited Weapons and Devices. e. Certain weapons. Any person who knowingly has in his possession any gravity knife, switchblade knife, dagger, dirk, stiletto, billy, blackjack, metal knuckle, sandclub, slingshot, cestus or similar leather band studded with metal filings or razor blades imbedded in wood, ballistic knife, without any explainable lawful purpose, is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree.

No, that was stun guns. Those "assault" Sling shots with those "high capacity" pouches are still illegal.

No, not at all.

Just saw this, thinking it was a reaction to all that attention the Lacey School Board received. Apparently they feel the children are worth protecting, not like some other Liberal schools feel. Armed guards in the school, will it make them like prisons now? Lacey Looking For More Police Officers To Staff Schools LACEY TOWNSHIP, NJ - The Lacey Township police department is looking for retired police officers to staff schools in the Lacey school district for the 2018-2019 school year, Police Chief Michael C. DiBella said. Applicants must also have a New Jersey Police Training Commission Basic Police Officer Certification or New Jersey State Police Academy Certification. They must be capable of passing firearms qualifications as mandated by the New Jersey Attorney General. https://patch.com/new-jersey/lacey/lacey-looking-more-police-officers-staff-schools

On the dark side, she destroyed a nice pair of shoes in the water.

Personally, I always buy new, I'm not into sloppy seconds to save a few bucks versus the unknowns... Specially when it comes to firearms and parachutes....

Who's bigger?

These are the traitors sponsoring the bill: Sponsored by: Senator LORETTA WEINBERG District 37 (Bergen) Senator STEPHEN M. SWEENEY District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem) Here is the revised text: (b) Nothing in subsection j. of this section shall apply to a law enforcement officer who possesses and carries while off-duty a large capacity ammunition magazine capable of holding not more than 17 rounds of ammunition that can be fed continuously and directly into a semi-automatic firearm. (c) Notwithstanding subparagraph (b) of this paragraph, subsection j. of this section shall not apply to a law enforcement officer who possesses and carries while off-duty a large capacity ammunition magazine capable of holding more than 17 rounds of ammunition that can be fed continuously and directly into a semi-automatic firearm provided the large capacity ammunition magazine is used with a service firearm issued to the officer by the officer’s employer for use in the officer’s official duties. I was thinking about this when out walking the pup a little earlier. These assholes in Trenton are basically saying our lives and personal defense are worth LESS than the life of a off-duty police officer. These are the dirtbags in Trenton where WE PAY THEIR SALARIES. How does this new information get out to ALL gun owners and FUDDS in the state so everyone can see the disdain for the average law abiding citizens held by the politicians we pay in this state?

Ahhhhh, part of the protected class.... ....."The new measure, S-2846, "allows a law enforcement officer to possess and carry while off-duty a large capacity ammunition magazine capable of holding 17 rounds of ammunition or less," according to the text of the bill. It also allows off-duty police to possess a larger magazine "provided it is used with the officer's service firearm issued by the officer's employer." The law would effectively establish different rules for how much ammunition police and civilians can carry. It's unclear whether the existing law has affected any active-duty cops.

Don't be offended, I've been on one of these computer thingies for multiple decades and still learn new tricks all the time. My feeling is, the day you stop learning new things, is the day you die.

I've been doing that from the beginning. It definitely saves all that time editing out the text you don't want in the reply. Nah, we wouldn't do that, but it does show, you CAN teach an old dog new tricks.

I think that varies by charity. In some cases they just give you a confirmation receipt that you made the donation, then you can claim what ever value you think it's worth at the time.

I just did a quick Kelly Blue Book on it, with FAIR condition. Trade in is around $700. Private Party value is about $1700. Depending how the OP values it... If he values it as GOOD: Trade in is around $800. Private Party value is about $2000. Using those values as a donation amount, it would knock some taxes due off of next year's tax return. Now, if he values it as VERY GOOD, he's up to $2400 on Private Party.

Yep, I agree, I've done that before. The tax deduction is a benefit. It's definitely the best way to go.