Regular Guy

I hope this spreads. It's time this state figures out that they can only govern us so long as we allow them to govern us. And I hope it helps the cases before SCOTUS. The state will have that much harder of a time arguing in favor of their laws when their own municipalities are refusing to abide by and enforce them.

While anything is possible, I think inheritance is a least likely scenario, not that it matters in the grand scheme of things. The bottom line is he got the gun and shot innocent people and all the democrat laws in Commie-fornia, are not going to ever legislate the evil out of people. But, to play armchair detective, lets consider he just turned 16 the day this happened. He would have been around 13 when his dad died. I don't think his dad's gun was given to him as an inherited item. His dad passed from a heart attack, which indicates his passing was sudden and unplanned for (as opposed to a terminal illness). I think it is more likely the gun was taken from the home without the knowledge of what ever adult is responsible for him and the home. It's possible that the dad passed suddenly and the remaining responsible adult did not know there was a gun hidden away somewhere (or could not find it) and the kid came across it first and kept it without anyone knowing. I would consider those more likely than someone willing handing down his fathers gun to him.

Pretty naive of you to believe their is a boundary that could not be crossed by those seeking power.

Every auto manufacturer in this country should donate to Remington's cause to fight this case. This is going to open the door for every family of every person injured or killed in a DWI to sue the car company for the advertising the car's acceleration, handling or traction abilities. Every alcohol producer needs is about to be on the hook for every rape and/or sexual assault by anyone for every commercial where a guy opens a beer and proceeds to hang out with an attractive female. My daughter just called and is on her way home from work and has car issues so I have to cut my rant short.

There are business decisions and some of which are tough to make, but what Dick's did went beyond being a business decision. It's one thing to not be interested in carrying firearms or firearm related merchandise, but to donate money to legislative campaigns, lobbyist and organizations that overtly attempt to undermine and destroy the 2nd amendment is a conscious, intentional, unforgivable act.

#Me2A

The trigger must be pulled with the index finger and middle finger simultaneously. This is a huge deviation from ergonomic standards. The open trigger guard looks like it is just begging to get snagged on EVERYTHING. They use a magnum .22 rounds. Keeping in mind that the two ways bullets stop people are by interrupting the CNS or bleeding out enough to reduce blood pressure/flow to the brain, I rather have bigger rounds that expand to cause more damage. The way they trash talk semi-auto handguns in this promo makes it seem like they are marketing to inexperienced hipsters who will quote the same dumb info from their ad. "This is way safer than a semi-auto handgun. The ammo is way safer too."

They won't want to build up any history if they come here and post questions and everybody ignores them.

Is it a magazine vice block or an actual display stand like this?

It says this can occur on average of 1 in 10,000. So there should be a few handfuls of them in NJ somewhere.

A gun shop I frequent just recently got inspected by the ATF. When I asked what they look for during an inspection, one of the things he mentioned is it is illegal to run NICS without the person present to do 4473. Reason being is that if the NICS check results in customer being denied and the customer is not present, he/she may not come in to do the paperwork, thus leaving the shop with a denial on their record with no corresponding 4473 in the shop records. The ATF looks at all documents for accuracy during their audit but they shows up with a list of all denied applicants and start with those 4473's.

Another vote for Target Sports. I use their prime membership which give you an 8% discount on all ammo and free shipping on all orders, not just bulk purchases. With the 8% discount, their prices are lower than when other places have ammo on sale.

I have: .22LR .380ACP 9mm .45ACP .50AE 5.56x45 7.62x39 (don't have a gun for this anymore) 7.62x51 /.308 12Ga (slugs, 00buck and birdshot)

So in plain English, what happens tomorrow?

Checkmate.

Got one of these in Burlington Township the other morning on my way to work. Does Wawa label these different in north Jersey?

I cast another vote for Sea Bands. On a river or on a lake i'm fine, but on the ocean when there boat is pitching, rolling, yawing and heaving, I puke until I dry heave, then I dry heave until I'm back on land. I don't get motion sickness on planes, helicopters, motor-vehicles, etc but boat smaller than a cruise ship, I get sick. I use sea bands and they worked.

I bought new a Springfield Armory Inc. handgun back in April and had a warranty issue. They emailed me a shipping label and I sent it directly to them via FedEx. They repaired it and sent it back directly to my house. Someone over 21 had to sign for it. If nobody is available to sign for it after 3 delivery attempts, FedEx will hold it at their facility for a few more days (forgot exactly how many) for you to come pick it up, then they will send it back to the sender if you haven't picked it up by then.

Good article. Definitely not a news source I use at all but since you posted it, I went on and read it. Shockingly, it seems to be very well written. It has a lot of quoted text with name sources and only two references to something said by an "anonymous source" but those references by those sources are not fundamental to the article at all. I did not detect any slanted opinion cast in by the author/editors. Just a straight forward piece on what Dell'Aguila does not like about the NRA's current business practices and what he would like to see changed. I actually found it informative to see what Dell"Aguila position was on the whole thing since my lowly lifetime member status with the NRA does not grant me access to this type of information. It grants me access to weekly postal bombardments from Mr. LaPierre but none of that provides any details on the current rift going on at the executive level.

Do we get any credit for being members of any other 2A organization like ANJRC, NRA, NJ2AS? Do they all work together or is it a competition to see who can "carry all the water?"

I just picked this up yesterday. Magnum Research. Different. All metal.

If you are buying a magazine by itself, most of the bigger online retailers (Cabelas, Midway, Brownells, GunMagWarehouse.com, TargetSportsUSA, CheaperThanDirt, etc) are set up to prohibit standard capacity magazines and other items from being shipped to NJ addresses. If you are purchasing a firearm, some places offer the option to substitute the included standard capacity magazines with 10 rd mags, if available. Others will simply remove the standard mags and ship the firearm without one. The NJ State Police is actively making under cover attempts to purchase standard and high capacity magazines online to see which retailers will ship them. There is a thread on here about a company in Nevada that shipped standard mags to NJ, not knowing it was the police. They were sent a letter from the Attorney General's Offices informing them that NJ has laws against it and asked them to stop shipping them to NJ addresses. 6 months later, the police were successful in getting 15, 30 and 100 round mags from the same online company so the State is now going to sue them for civil violations. There is a discussion about it on this thread here

@Bob2222 I know it's already a crime, but look at how many gun laws they pass where it's already a crime at both the State and Federal level. The politicians don't know most of the current laws related to firearms and neither does the general public. So when they pass a law, they look like they are doing something. This makes the sheep feel safe and the sheep keep voting for them.

What I think they were going for with this bill is that they want to be able to charge the owner of a firearm in cases where the firearm is taken by another member of the household like in cases where they are taken to schools by kids or otherwise used in crimes. But then the penalty is a disorderly persons offense. It does not seem to be enforceable outside of the instances when the gun is discovered (after the fact) to have been left unsecured.

If the NRA top leaders would stop squabbling like some grade school drama queens maybe we NJ2AS and ANJRPC could get some more effective support in defending the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.