Gosh, do half the things from this short vid and you'll be targeted for some enhanced questioning...

But seriously, I agree with a lot of the survivalist thinking. Preparedness is something that should be evolving in all of our lives, regardless of our locale, background, or beliefs. There are many things that can be done by individuals, like learning/brushing up on: First aid, mech work, basic intelligence (what wild vegetation is safe, etc), land nav. Honing our shooting is obviously something that can be done solo as well (though always more fun with folk).

But if the worse were to happen, chances are we would function in small groups (or should). So, to learn/train in those groups would optimize training, right? Things like movement (ranger files, wedge formations, reaction to direct/indirect fire) take a lot of time to get right, and goes beyond just being able to execute, and more on relying on the guy next to you (I'm sure the mil/ex mil guys can attest to that)... so, either start practicing and/or trust your bud/neighbors. As for squad-based combat, I don't want to say its not necessary, but that's the part that would probably throw up a red flag for the Feds. But if you do airsoft or paintball, or even dry runs, those could be good substitutes (instead of paying thousands to rent a shooting house like what they have at Blackwater or Scottsdale Gun Club).

Yeah.. full blown militia training. Out here you're lucky if the officers that come out to arrest you aren't SWAT if you were caught doing all that. Survival training, however, is always a good idea. You might be able to supplement the rest with paintball matches and NRA classes.

Who has that much time?

You got time to shoot. No point in excelling at one aspect if it will hinder others.