http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/04/chatham_police_officer_accused.html

 

results about what I expected. disgraceful.

I think if this was during the corzine administration I think the outcome/penalty would have been different. Too many people are paying attention to things going on in this state, and for good reason.

Hmm, perhaps a large resident of Chatham was aware of the situation.

Call and express your displeasure....

 

Mayor:

 

 

[email protected]

V. Nelson Vaughan, III- [email protected]

 

Cell phone-973-417-2964

 

Council

Members

 

 

 

 

Council President: James J. Collander- [email protected]

 

973-635-0674 ext 581

 

Council Member Bruce A. [email protected]

 

973-635-7772

 

Council Member Joseph L. Marts- [email protected]

 

Cell phone-973-868-6300

 

Council Member James [email protected]

 

Cell phone-973-738-0912

 

Council Member John Holman- [email protected]

 

Cell phone-646-266-0234

 

Council Member Leonard Resto- [email protected]

 

973-635-0674

Absolutely insane. If that had been a citizen he would have been jailed, and he'd never be able to touch a firearm again in his life.

definitely not a fair outcome....unreal that in this time and day outcomes are different depending on what you are....

definitely not a fair outcome....unreal that in this time and day outcomes are different depending on what you are....

 

Does this really surprise you?

hotshot, it's always been that way... the problem is that in this day and age it should no longer be so.

I would think the attorney general would be the one to call, not the reps..

If you follow the other thread on this, our LEO point out that there is actually very little criminal laws that he could have been persecuted for, similar to a civilian (minus the "loaded" part).

 

..just saying..

If you follow the other thread on this, our LEO point out that there is actually very little criminal laws that he could have been persecuted for, similar to a civilian (minus the "loaded" part).

 

..just saying..

 

except what legal citizen is allowed to carry a gun on himself in the first place!

If you follow the other thread on this, our LEO point out that there is actually very little criminal laws that he could have been persecuted for, similar to a civilian (minus the "loaded" part).

 

..just saying..

 

except what legal citizen is allowed to carry a gun on himself in the first place!

 

thats what im saying.. because he is a cop, the loaded part applies.

 

If you or me lost their gun (assuming all other laws where followed), it would be hard to pin any charges on the civilian for it.

If you follow the other thread on this, our LEO point out that there is actually very little criminal laws that he could have been persecuted for, similar to a civilian (minus the "loaded" part).

 

..just saying..

 

except what legal citizen is allowed to carry a gun on himself in the first place!

 

thats what im saying.. because he is a cop, the loaded part applies.

 

If you or me lost their gun (assuming all other laws where followed), it would be hard to pin any charges on the civilian for it.

 

 

The cop did not lose his gun, he got drunk and forgot where his weapon was...this is not the same thing....

Look, I'm not on anyone's side.. all I'm saying is the law that was presented in the other thread. Then it turned into an anti-cop / pro-cop debate.