See

.

 

(While I am proud of our state, maybe they would also like to stand up for other parts of the constitution?)

Another good article:

http://gizmodo.com/5692198/a-tsa-success-story

Mike Dorherty is the man

Gotta give the ACLU huge credit. They have their bullshlt down to a science.

 

No matter what process or procedure is in place, they have talking points against, and are willing to go to the mat for it...

 

Scanners are intrusive, and "administrative pat-downs" are assault, therefore we're against it

Profiling is discriminatory and arbitrarily singles out groups and individuals for special scrutiny, therefore we're against it

Doing nothing is irresponsible and puts the flying public at risk, therefore we're against it

 

But, they're okay with selectively sending people through the scanners based on some unknown and objective "feeling" that an unskilled, minimum wage and minimally trained checkpoint worker may have about a particular passenger as they go through the security system.

 

I just love it. They get to sue someone for something no matter what.

where was everybody when we were spending money to buy these machines ??????????????????????