Thinking about installing a Magpul PRS stock on my med-long range AR, so I went web-surfing for the best price. Came across a site called mysmartgear.com and they have it cheaper than anyone else - no one even matches this price. Little red flags went up and alarm bells sounded. They have all the BBB flags etc on the site, but, heck I can cut and paste them too. Never heard of them and, being a cynic, I'm wary. Here's the listing...

 

http://www.mysmartgear.com/product.php?productid=71320&page=4

 

Anyone ever do business with them?

 

Thanks for any input.

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

http://www.bbb.org/central-northern-western-arizona/business-reviews/electronic-equipment-and-supplies-dealers/my-smart-gear-in-gilbert-az-1000015261/

 

I would be concerned about the item not being real magpul if the price was that great.

Use your CC if its not what you want you can dispute the transaction...thats what I do. How they got the stuff and how they can afford to sell it for a good price is not your concern. Just my two cents.

The PRS is a stock I've seen a lot of copies of, even a bunch of airspoft ones. I'd call or email first, but like others have said you can always dispute the charge. Nice stock, very solid. Used to have one on my M1A.

The reason why most sites list the same price, $242.25 in this case, is due to Magpul's MAP policy. A dealer caught advertising for less than MAP risks their continuing to be a dealer. Prices that seem too good to be true typically are.

Magpul Industries (Precesion) Rifle/Sniper Stock Stock Black Fully Adjustable AR-15 MAG307-BLK

Straight from that site, notice the part I put in parenthesis... I don't trust any site that doesn't check their own spelling and grammar.

if you want a real PRS check with Paul I got mine from him and the pricing was competitive.. or even midwestPX.. while either might not be the single best price they will be competitive and at least you know you are getting a real quality item.. this stock is great.. I have no complaints..

im thinking its not legit, as originally stated.