Besides that, there's some interesting information about how the antis skew statistics, and why facts and honest debate takes the air out of their sails.

 

Article link

I like the FL example. I never argue that concealed carry prevents crime when talking to an anti. I always point out that it can't be argued that it does not hinder the prevention of crime. If they come up with an area where violence is high and there is concealed carry there, I bring up an area where it is low and then say "well since there can be high crime in CCW areas and low crime in CCW areas then crime must not be linked to CCW, there must be another factor that makes crime levels increase or decrease."

I like the FL example. I never argue that concealed carry prevents crime when talking to an anti. I always point out that it can't be argued that it does not hinder the prevention of crime. If they come up with an area where violence is high and there is concealed carry there, I bring up an area where it is low and then say "well since there can be high crime in CCW areas and low crime in CCW areas then crime must not be linked to CCW, there must be another factor that makes crime levels increase or decrease."

 

There's plenty of high crime in NJ and there's (essentially) no CCW anywhere anyhow.