I know we like to discuss the matter among ourselves and that's just fine and dandy but I was just wondering if there were any public debates between the two sides. I would really like to hear how those ended.

 

I can already guess an "agree to disagree" but I still would like to hear the two sides battle it out.

I know we like to discuss the matter among ourselves and that's just fine and dandy but I was just wondering if there were any public debates between the two sides. I would really like to hear how those ended.

 

I can already guess an "agree to disagree" but I still would like to hear the two sides battle it out.

Like a formal debate? Not even worth it.

Like a formal debate? Not even worth it.

 

yes a formal debate. and yeah probably not but i still would like to hear it.

 

i recently read a page about the brady campaign's push to stop guns on college campuses. and all they do is sit and talk about how college students binge drink, are high risk, some are suicidal, etc. and while i don't agree that all college students are this way. not once do they mention anything about what is wrong with teachers carrying but they strongly oppose both students AND teachers from carrying.

 

i think 5 of the victims from the VTech shooting were teachers. I think 3 died protecting their students while they escaped out the windows.

yes a formal debate. and yeah probably not but i still would like to hear it.

 

i recently read a page about the brady campaign's push to stop guns on college campuses. and all they do is sit and talk about how college students binge drink, are high risk, some are suicidal, etc. and while i don't agree that all college students are this way. not once do they mention anything about what is wrong with teachers carrying but they strongly oppose both students AND teachers from carrying.

 

i think 5 of the victims from the VTech shooting were teachers. I think 3 died protecting their students while they escaped out the windows.

This is why formal debates don't happen between the two, there is no logic on there side or anything to support their claims. A debate between the two would end up being a complete waste of time because they dont listen to anything people have to say, they just make SH8t up and pretend like its real. Debates are very useful when people are deciding or on the fence about any given topic, and can give insight to many different aspects of the topic, but u need the two sides to have strong opinions supported by data and results. The anti's would never have a real debate because they would get torn and chewed up. We have good stats that support our views, but all they have are angry people who twist real life situations to fit there need. They try and correlate every violent act with guns being the #1 problem with nothing to back up the claim other then a gun was used in the crime. So they have no arguments in a debate, only statements which hold little water. It's much easier for them to just go public with there opinions, publish there crap, and have the sheep read and believe it.