Why the penis comments?

The forum auto-changes the correctly spelled c0ck to penis - so when you originally wrote "c ock the hammer" the forum changed it to "penis the hammer". Looks like you edited it to "c0ck" after the fact, but not before Nick was able to quote the "penis"

The forum auto-changes the correctly spelled c0ck to penis - so when you originally wrote "c ock the hammer" the forum changed it to "penis the hammer". Looks like you edited it to "c0ck" after the fact, but not before Nick was able to quote the "penis"

 

You are absolutely right. Nick was quite fast. I notice in maybe 4 seconds and he beat me to it.

For my money, I would rather get the SP101 in 22LR with the 8-shot cylinder and the 4" barrel. An SP101 with a 3" barrel might be really nice, too, if it comes out. The reissued S&W Model 63 would also be a nice choice.

The draw to the LCR version is its smaller size and to those who want to carry. I'd imagine the SP101 is not very pocketable, although I guess that really doesn't matter in NJ.

The draw to the LCR version is its smaller size and to those who want to carry. I'd imagine the SP101 is not very pocketable, although I guess that really doesn't matter in NJ.

 

It wouldn't be that pocketable with a larger cylinder and its current 4" barrel if that is specifically what was wanted.

It wouldn't be that pocketable with a larger cylinder and its current 4" barrel if that is specifically what was wanted.

 

 

You're talking about the SP101. I'm referring to the LCR of having the draw to be pocket carried.

I think he is refering to the lack of inventory when it comes to the sr1911, cannot find one anywhere.

 

Yes, I was. I haven't seen the SR1911 or gp-101 in 22, which I was was interested in... speaking of things that don't exist, how sweet would a Ruger 1911-22 be?

I really like this gun, looks sweet.

 

Do they make a the SP101 in 22lr still or is it out of production? I've never seen one ever.

Do they make a the SP101 in 22lr

They make them - a couple members on the forum have them if I remember correctly

http://www.ruger.com/products/sp101/models.html

They make a 4 inch SP101 now! In 357 too! Wow, Ruger is maning up and putting out more options now.

They make them - a couple members on the forum have them if I remember correctly

http://www.ruger.com...101/models.html

 

Oh yeah actually I remember this recently came out. I guess I was thinking of one

that looks like the 2"/3" model. Thanks for the link.

I was really stoked when I first heard of this LCR-22, until I started reading about this Taurus 94 SS 2". I has a fully adjustable rear sight and hold 9-rounds instead of 8-rounds. Based on the Taurus 94 5" that I own, I'd imagine trigger on the 2" is just as heavy, so the Ruger probably wins there.

 

 

 

 

The more I look at this, the more it seems to be a unfair comparison between these two guns. The Ruger is half the weight and is mostly synthetic vs. the all stainless Taurus. In addition the hammer is exposed in the Taurus as opposed to hidden in the Ruger. Either way, both look like nice guns.

This is the 1st indication of a real street price that I've seen. $430 + $20 shipping. I like the pistol, but I'm not sure I like it that much.

 

 

http://www.tombstonetactical.com/catalog/ruger/lcr-22-revolver-22lr-1.875in-8rd-black/

The price is comparable to the .38/.357 LCRs, so not much of a surprise there.

 

I feel that the real market for this gun is people that already own an LCR and want a low cost round to practice with.

The price is comparable to the .38/.357 LCRs, so not much of a surprise there.

 

I feel that the real market for this gun is people that already own an LCR and want a low cost round to practice with.

 

 

Good point.

I'd love one. I thought I would never want another 22 revolver but damn it this one is dope.