So some guy in Alabama gets beat up pretty badly by a gang of 20 people, and finds himself in ICU.

 

Yet some of the commentors say that if he used a gun to defend himself, he would have only resulted in escalting the violence. And that 'stand your ground' laws should be repealed so that people in his situation can't murder people and claim self defense.

 

WTF is wrong with people??

 

Remember, this is what the anti gun blobby is calling for, an end to all self defense protections. Think I'm misleading you? Read the articles about Duh Mayatollah and his current quest.

 

http://www2.wkrg.com/news/2012/apr/23/man-beaten-mob-critical-condition-ar-3659891/

"Escalation" of violence is just what that poor guy needed. This will just be swept away, as there is no sensationalism in the story...

If he had a gun, the instant someone got shot, the mob PROBABLY would have scattered.

Sounds like he really could of used a PMR-30. Could of shot them all once and half again..... before changing mags

Facing a mob of 20 in New Jersey, he would have had at least one mandatory mag change.

Facing a mob of 20 in New Jersey, he would have had at least one mandatory mag change.

 

In NJ it would be his responsibility to deescalate the situation.

 

If he did have to resort to trigger time, he would be charged and convicted of at least the following;

 

Noise pollution

Firing a gun within city limits

Illegal use of a firearm

Possession of a firearm for unauthorized usage

Littering

Illegal transfer of ammunition

Vagrancy

Loitering

Assembly without a permit

In NJ it would be his responsibility to deescalate the situation.

 

If he did have to resort to trigger time, he would be charged and convicted of at least the following;

 

Noise pollution

Firing a gun within city limits

Illegal use of a firearm

Possession of a firearm for unauthorized usage

Littering

Illegal transfer of ammunition

Vagrancy

Loitering

Assembly without a permit

 

In addition...

 

Creating a hazardous waste site (from the lead bullets)

Brandishing

Creating panic

Intent to ___________(add whatever charge in here)

Possession of an automatic pistol (the term the media loves to use).

Unlawful discharge

In addition...

 

Creating a hazardous waste site (from the lead bullets)

Brandishing

Creating panic

Intent to ___________(add whatever charge in here)

Possession of an automatic pistol (the term the media loves to use).

Unlawful discharge

 

Also;

 

Disorderly conduct

Terroristic threats

Bias Intimidation

Discrimination

Failure to keep firearm secure

Also;

 

Disorderly conduct

Terroristic threats

Bias Intimidation

Discrimination

Failure to keep firearm secure

 

But Hey! HE would have survived and not been beaten to a pulp!

But Hey! HE would have survived and not been beaten to a pulp!

 

Keep him nice and prestine for bubba when he gets to prison...

Failed on this one - see next post.

Edited April 24, 201214 yr by JamesC

Keep him nice and prestine for bubba when he gets to prison...

 

There goes the soap...

Facing a mob of 20 in New Jersey, he would have had at least one mandatory mag change.

 

Actually all he needed was a guy with a 12 ga. to fire just one round up in the air and rack the slide, then point it at the biggest mouth in the crowd and tell him he's the first to get "it". Crowd disperses if you just bring enough gun and act crazy enough to use it!

If he had a gun, the instant someone got shot, the mob PROBABLY would have scattered.

 

Exactly

I have a hard time feeling sory for the guy. The article says that he did chase a bunch of them off with a kitchen knife prior to the attack. It also says he he has a history of violence, not that, that makes it alright but, changes the story to "A** hole who chased kids with knife gets than gets his a** kicked when they come back after him"