http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495

 

 

 

 

Looks like it wasnt an ar-15 that committed this horrible event but 4 handguns.

 

Wonder if this will change the momentum of the AWB.

Doubt it will change the anti-gun sentiment to be honest with you. Guns are guns are guns to these people. They will just cite another instance where an evil assault black spec ops gun was used in a violent crime of some sort.

Like the shooting of the brave NY firefighters

 

 

 

Even though he was a felon and shouldnt have had a gun in the first place.....

This video aired December 15th. Since then they have said he used the AR-15 in the shooting.

I don't understand something, all the reports, and even the police said, handguns were used, then a medical examiner refutes everybody? I don't get it.

I posted this controversy early on and got hammered to $hit for it. Now it is surfacing again.

 

I agree anything is possible.

 

But I know on thing for sure... This forum is F'd up.

 

This administration has had a anti gun agenda all along and has far reaching tentacles.

That news report is from the 15th

I cannot get over his expression on his face, looks exactly like the theater shooter.

This is unbelievable . This should be the top story on every channel. The media is fuxxing EVIL. The whole country is up in arms about this evil semi- automatic gun and it wasn't the case. Holy Shite!!

Someone please close this thread. The title is inaccurate based on early information.

Why close thread? Was an ar15 used in the shooting?

We will never know the real truth...... I can almost guarantee than any future tragedy will involve the evil assault weapon.. The military weapon of choice.... The AR15... They may find a BB gun.... But it will be an AR15.

Not really hard to figure out what he used. Just look on the ground for shell casings.

Yup same bug eyed look right?

 

It is crazy that all I heard that day of the shooting was Ar15 this and assault rifle that.

Why close thread? Was an ar15 used in the shooting?

 

Yes. This article in the original post was created less than 24 hours after the shootings and it was incorrect on many details, including the fact that an AR was used and not "4 handguns". The firearm removed from the trunk was a shotgun, not the AR.

^Apparently the shotgun in question was a Saiga 12 at that.

 

When I read the news report it stated "Police are looking into the possibility that Lanza had a fourth weapon stashed in a car behind the school — an expensive high-tech Russian shotgun called a Saiga, CBS said."

 

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/hunt-motive-sandy-hook-elementary-shooting-article-1.1220914

 

Hadnt known the saiga was high tech or expensive prior to this.

So, why isn't this thread closed?

Yeah apparently people can't get over that the original reports were wrong. They had the name wrong, they had the weapons wrong, they had everything wrong. But optimism bias makes people run to these old reports and say "See .. it wasn't X,Y,Z" while all the followup reports corrected the original ones.

 

Then some folks want to build some conspiracy theory where the medical examiner, all the cops involved, all the crime lab techs, the FBI, the ATF, and every other agency involved somehow met in a room and agreed to lie about this and not a single soul involved decided to speak out to the media.

 

Grow up people, falling for the conspiracy theory de jour only makes our side look foolish and grasping at straws.