In 1994, after the passage of the Brady Act, and the Assault Weapons Ban, the Brady Bunch introduced a package of 'common sense' gun control laws.......

 

http://www.volokh.com/posts/1190402417.shtml

 

Go take a look, and see how much has actually passed over the years, or is currently being discussed in today's lingo of 'common sense' gun control......

 

So how many people on this forum will have the guts to admit these aren't that bad in terms of restrictions?

^{they suck. Tax? aresenal liscense if you have over 1000 rods or primers? DPRNL is gonna hand Arsenal liscenses' out like they do CCW or AW}

All of them are absolutely absurd

I am not particularly frontnof any of them but the arsenal license scares me the most for obvious reasons

So how many people on this forum will have the guts to admit these aren't that bad in terms of restrictions?

 

 

Are you serious?

Are you serious?

 

Yup.

Obvious troll is obvious.....

 

 

 

Do not feed

Obvious troll is obvious.....

 

 

 

Do not feed

 

He's not a troll, he's simply stating that some on here are willing to give up something to keep the peace.

 

 

Me?

 

NOT ONE INCH.........

that is absurd. i would not support any of that. EVER!!!

I am not particularly frontnof any of them but the arsenal license scares me the most for obvious reasons

 

Read the fine print, the arsenal license is only for women.

 

I oppose it for the same obvious reasons.

 

And quite frankly, it's sexist.

 

I also oppose:

- the ownership licensing (NJ already plays that game with carry licenses -- shall issue is so difficult to attain that is effectively never issued)

- the taxes (if we wish to generate more money for healthcare then more tax revenue should go to healthcare)

- persons barred from gun ownership (barred with a misdemeanor no jail time???)

- gun and magazine bans (glocks banned? colt detective special banned? wtf)

- other provisions (one handgun a month? sounds familiar)

 

Is the OP a serious post? The text in the link openly mocks the proposed Brady II legislation and even describes how the government will subvert the regulations to restrict firearms even further than the Brady's already draconian intent (as written)