Interesting video:

 

 

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2107565507001/rudy-giuliani-weighs-in-on-gun-control-debate/

Does the audio quality suck for anyone else?

yes

He went from it being unconstitutional to confiscation, to supporting possible unlawful searches and seizures back to supporting an AWB. WHAT THE HELL DOES NOT BE INFRINGED MEAN? How does this some how translate to xyz? I only have a 5th grade education but gee wiz. lol

He went from it being unconstitutional to confiscation, to supporting possible unlawful searches and seizures back to supporting an AWB. WHAT THE HELL DOES NOT BE INFRINGED MEAN? How does this some how translate to xyz? I only have a 5th grade education but gee wiz. lol

 

You can't really trust a politician from NY to support the Constitution. I'm aware that a few do, but apprently there's something in the air that makes most ignore civil rights.

NY scumbag. Some act like Cumo, some act like Giuliani. All are totalitarian, all anti-gun, all demand the federal government disobey the bill of rights and do what they want to every person in our Nation.

The older I get, the dumber I find I am, but I'm glad if I'm not the only one who found him confusing.

 

Heller vs DC followed AWB 1.0, so now it's not OK to ban AWs now but it's a good idea to ban "military style" AWs? I thought selective-fire has been a no-no for new civilian firearms in the US since 1986 -- but is that what he meant? Or they're OK if they're painted pink but not if they're Parkerized? He didn't sound like he had thought this all through, except that Cuomo's "#7" is a pretty dumb idea, which it is.

 

He's not running for office any more, so maybe that explains it.

Giuliani: Respect the 2nd Amendment (but not really), disregard all the other Amendments.

 

NY tap water...not even once.

Google "Stop and Frisk" and see the kind of friggin bs Giuliani, Bloomberg, Kelly, etc. come up with.

 

If that doesn't make your blood boil, I don't know what will. Those guys have never even heard of rights.