I took apart the video stream from the 2/21/13 Assembly Session and broke it up according to each bill if it had discussion and posted them on YouTube.

 

Here are a few of them...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for the post.

 

Hearing the specifics of the "gun control" arguments leads me to believe that those representatives are complete morons. They are not there to represent all of their constituents, or to objectively look at both sides of an issue. They have their own personal agenda to push regardless of what we think.

 

Instead of representing the wishes and views of the "people" they just do the opposite. The legislators push their own ideas onto their constituents by coercing them with mis-information, fear and other emotion. There is no room for debate, their minds are already made up. And except for those who presented pro-gun arguments... they all should be voted out of public office.

 

I am sick and tired of hearing gun-control proponents swear that they respect and uphold the 2nd Amendment and that they are not trying to take our guns away or infringe our rights of self protection. They say they just want to take guns out of the hands of criminals but the only hands that will be empty are ours. They just want to make the streets safer... but the streets are only made safer for the criminals. Those of us who legally own firearms are treated like future criminals or potential threats. We have to be watched and monitored. We are treated as if we are breaking the law unless through exemption we prove otherwise. Isn't that guilty until proven innocent?

 

These gun-control pundits have underestimated just how serious this issue is for many in and out of the firearms community. Although they might win some of the initial legal battles I believe that in the end they will lose the war. The result of which will be totally to their disliking. The pendulum they have set in motion will swing back the other way and whereas they pushed for comprehensive gun control they will end up with no control. CCW, "open carry", the "castle doctrine" and "stand your ground" might become the law of the land one day. I hope when that day comes they will remember that they made it all possible.

 

<Sorry, but sometimes a person just has to vent their opinion and there is no better place than with those who are like minded.>

A3748 was kind of tough to debate especially with the way that O'Donnell was presenting his argument. I presume that the best way to articulate the argument against that bill was to say: (Just expounding what Carroll said) In New Jersey we submit to a background check when applying for the FID AND pistol permit. In order to get another pistol permit we need to submit to another background check. By that very background check we are "good to go" for 90 days. That is a three month window to legally buy a pistol. In the case of selling a pistol to someone out of state it is required to go through an FFL. Why? The purchaser, who is out of state, has not gone through the background check. That is why it is necessary to go through an FFL so that the purchaser can go through a background check.

 

What are your thoughts on this bill and the questioning between Carroll and O'Donnell?

Anyone have a link to the video where mainor said it took 20 seconds to change magazines? It was during the committee hearing