This video should be mandatory viewing for every senator and the governor before they vote on reducing magazine size:

 

 

It presents lots of facts about magazine size and how even police need larger not smaller magazines. It also gives several demonstrations of the time needed to shoot 30 rounds with 15, 10 and 6 rounds in a magazine. The best part is towards the end they have a runner that is 25 feet from the shooter and he starts when the guy goes to change a mag and then stops when the next shot is fired -- HE NEVER GETS CLOSE TO THE SHOOTER!!!!!

 

 

Please send a brief summary along with the video to your senator and our governor!

Not for nothing but that first part is completely bogus. You can tell without even timing it that the guy's rate of fire increases on the series when he uses the lower capacity mags. The second part, the guy is barely running towards the woman. If that was me, an able bodied male in my 30s I would have knocked her right off her feet before she had that mag changed, possibly the guy too.

 

I agree with what they are trying to point out but they should have made it more solid.

Not for nothing but that first part is completely bogus. You can tell without even timing it that the guy's rate of fire increases on the series when he uses the lower capacity mags. The second part, the guy is barely running towards the woman. If that was me, an able bodied male in my 30s I would have knocked her right off her feet before she had that mag changed, possibly the guy too.

 

I agree with what they are trying to point out but they should have made it more solid.

 

I understand what you are saying, but not sure I would call it bogus. Perhaps he was just rushing his shots more because he knew he had to make the changes? As far as the guy running. I think it shows that the person has to be sure that the firing has stopped, and then by the time he accelerates and starts running it is too late as the shooter has already started again.

 

I found the issues about the NYC police missing so much (and they are supposed to be the experts) good reason to not cut down citizens ability to defend themselves, especially since we are not the "experts" that the politicians "know" the police are.