Wilson Combat Announces

Anti-Gun States, No-Sale Policy

Effective: February 28, 2013

 

Wilson Combat will no longer provide any products or services to any State Government imposing legislation that infringes on the second amendment rights of its law abiding citizens. This includes any Law Enforcement Department, Law Enforcement Officers, or any State Government Entity or Employee of such an entity. This also applies to any local municipality imposing such infringements.

 

States currently included in our No-Sale Policy are:

• California
  
• Hawaii
  
• Maryland
  
• Massachusetts
  
• New Jersey
  
• New York
  
• Washington D.C.
  
• The City of Chicago, Illinois
  

Wilson Combat will in NO way support the government of these states or their anti-gun agenda that only limits the rights of law-abiding citizens. Wilson Combat will continue to supply any product and/or service they can legally sell in these states to all non-government affiliated citizens.

 

Ryan Wilson,

Vice President

 

http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=7b1a9382c490b04b227c7c2b9&id=88cd64a386

 

https://www.facebook.com/#!/WilsonCombat?fref=ts

awesomeeeeee! a lot of companies are doing this!

 

how awesome would it be if your county or state had to change laws because no one would sell them magazines

 

unlikely and never happen but wow would that be awesome!!

 

 

 

there would be one company that sold them mags at $300 a pop and us tax payers would just have to pay for them lol

Is awesome, but we really need the big companies to do it. Like I mentioned in other threads, a lot of these companies probably don't make much profit or any from government contracts as I doubt they have any. So they stand nada to lose by saying f.u...

 

Still, good to see and hopefully the biggies will follow.

 

 

Sent from John's iPad 2 via Tapatalk HD

Typos courtesy Apple...

Great I hope this is going to catch on.

My fear is that the big companies are waiting for all the smaller ones to back out so that THEY can hone in on the profit.

it would be great if Glock starts doing this...Glock should also not sell any repair parts to any state that does not respect its citizens right to bear arms.

I like this the only thing is Even if all the companies did this there will be someone who wants to get rich. Start a company and service the government with their weapons . This really is a lose lose for the companys who are boycotting the gubment. Boycotting leo's that work for those dept's. now thats silly.

Do we have a list of all the companies taking a stand? It's difficult to keep up with all these threads. I have P2P's coming in and would like to support companies that support me

I posted a link somewhere, just check my posts from my profile... I forget myself and on ipad...

 

Do we have a list of all the companies taking a stand? It's difficult to keep up with all these threads. I have P2P's coming in and would like to support companies that support me

 

 

Sent from John's iPad 2 via Tapatalk HD

Typos courtesy Apple...

Symbolically, i like that more and more companies are jumping on board with this. But i do have to wonder how many municipal PDs buy $2500 1911s for their officers

Do we have a list of all the companies taking a stand? It's difficult to keep up with all these threads. I have P2P's coming in and would like to support companies that support me

 

I don't believe any of the main/mainstream pistol companies are doing it... (other than wilson) Mostly aftermarket ar stuff companies and while it is a great idea and "makes a statement " to firearm enthuiasts unless the big boys that the govt (fed &states) actually use it will have no real effect and that doesn't seem likely to happen to me at this point.....

 

I'm going to join the list of patriotic companies fighting tyranny ..... I vow to not sell any weapons..parts or ammo to states or Feds that are passing any 2a infringing laws....same effect

it would be great if Glock starts doing this...Glock should also not sell any repair parts to any state that does not respect its citizens right to bear arms.

 

Then we'll see some action. But, Glock's biggest contracts are with LEO's so that aint happenin.

Makes me want to buy one of their 3,000 dollar pistols

I'd almost rather them not do this, just let any orders sit idly in the cue, with any and all orders both before and after going ahead of them. Make them think they are still going to get their stuff.

colt,bushmaster,remington,barrett ,mossberg,sig, glock, to name a few that need to remember where their bread is buttered

colt,bushmaster,remington,barrett ,mossberg,sig, glock, to name a few that need to remember where their bread is buttered

 

forget Colt, they have abandoned the civilian market and eat off of government contracts

Barrett has...

 

colt,bushmaster,remington,barrett ,mossberg,sig, glock, to name a few that need to remember where their bread is buttered

 

 

Sent from John's iPad 2 via Tapatalk HD

Typos courtesy Apple...

I'd almost rather them not do this, just let any orders sit idly in the cue, with any and all orders both before and after going ahead of them. Make them think they are still going to get their stuff.

 

haha i like that idea!...treat them like us and pistol permits...and every time they call to follow up...give them one of the stories we get...lol

Symbolically, i like that more and more companies are jumping on board with this. But i do have to wonder how many municipal PDs buy $2500 1911s for their officers

 

Oh how I wish

How many cops or Federalies are using Wilson Combats? NOT MANY

 

But Glock, Mossberg, Remington and Smith&Wesson? MANY

Theres a list on a dedicated site somewhere

while it would be nice to have the big companies join in the fight, ever little bit helps. the more companies that support us, the more we should support them. stop buying from those large companies and they will get the hint. while much of their business goes towards leo and govt contracts, their main income comes from us.

http://www.thepoliceloophole.com/

 

Here ya go.

Thanks... That's the one I posted but couldn't remember the name...

 

http://www.thepoliceloophole.com/

 

Here ya go.

 

 

Sent from John's iPad 2 via Tapatalk HD

Typos courtesy Apple...

Colt? What Colt?

 

FN Manufacturing has outbid Remington Arms Company and Colt Defense LLC., to win a contract worth just under $77 million to make M4A1s for the U.S. Army, according to an industry source. The award notice was posted on Federal Business Opportunities on Feb. 22 with an initial value of $9,370,615.

This is the latest round in what has become a hard-fought battle to equip soldiers with a better carbine.

The drama all began when the Army chose Remington over Colt, the original maker of the M4, last April to make 120,000 M4s and M4A1 carbines. That award meant that more soldiers would go into combat with the M4A1, a SOF version of the carbine that features a more durable barrel and a full-auto trigger. The Army’s decision to dump the three-round burst setting will give soldiers a more consistent trigger and better accuracy.

 

The GAO did rule in favor of Colt’s first protest over the Army’s miscalculation of royalties it would receive for contract awards on its M4 design. The July 24 ruling forced the Army to rework the original solicitation so the vendors that fell into the competitive range could submit new price bids. All gun makers involved were forced to reveal their previous price bids for the original $84 million contract to keep things fair.

Colt officials then filed an Oct. 9 protest with the GAO three weeks after the Connecticut-based gun maker received the Army’s amended Sept. 21 solicitation. The GAO denied Colt’s second protest in a Nov. 16 decision.

This latest decision makes FN the only maker of both M16A4s and M4 carbine variants for the U.S. Military (I think.) The majority of the contract will supply M4A1s to the Army as part of its ongoing effort to upgrade its fleet of M4s.

 

 

Read more: http://kitup.military.com/2013/02/army-awards-m4m4a1-contract-fn.html#ixzz2MFJjSqhR

Kit Up!

haha i like that idea!...treat them like us and pistol permits...and every time they call to follow up...give them one of the stories we get...lol

 

Gee i had to go through the same process as everyone else every time i ever bought a handgun during my career

Gee i had to go through the same process as everyone else every time i ever bought a handgun during my career

i wasnt referring to leo personal purchases..i realize you/they go through the same process as "joe public"...and i dont think its an instant permit when you want one...but i do have a tough time believing that the towns that make average citizens wait 9 months do the same to their officers (that is is they choose to purchase anything other than their issued weapons)...i was more referring to the agencies purchasing service weapons etc....as i know its not the leo on the phone that is the root of the problem..just the messenger... albeit some deliver with added toxicity...