NJ.com had a story today on a decision from the NJ supreme court on house searches, From reading the article I would say the citizen who's apartment was searched in Jersey City and his firearms confiscated that the city should be dropping the charges. Sorry but think won't paste. Go to NJ.com

I believe this is the article... http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/03/nj_supreme_court_police_cannot.html#incart_m-rpt-1

This could be very good news for Keith Pantaleon

hmm, yes it could be..

knowing NJ it wont be retroactive but here's to wishful thinking.

This case dates back to 2008

This case dates back to 2008

Sounds about right, State f-cks with your life for 2 years while they get their balls in the sack...... Good timing for Keith though....

DAs, prosecutors and police ought to be liable

DAs, prosecutors and police ought to be liable

 

DING DING DING +1

I specially like this tidbit:

"But Justice Anne Patterson, the lone dissenter, wrote an opinion in which she said the majority had improperly constrained the actions of well-intentioned police officers trying to determine if someone needs help."

 

It's all about the intentions, laws, rights be damned.

I specially like this tidbit:

"But Justice Anne Patterson, the lone dissenter, wrote an opinion in which she said the majority had improperly constrained the actions of well-intentioned police officers trying to determine if someone needs help."

 

It's all about the intentions, laws, rights be damned.

 

Anne Patterson? The Judge who the anti gun blobby wet the bed about???

....too funny

DAs, prosecutors and police ought to be liable

+1