It is not even out yet but from the picture it looks like it might not pass the pinky test.  Any thoughts?

 

 

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_2_282/239312_Dynacomp_V2.html&page=2

Eh doesn't look too bad.

That looks like it should be OK. The end is closed and there is an aperture that appears slightly larger than the projectile being fired.

 

As long is it is not marketed as a "Flash Hider" or they market it that "flash hiding" is a primary purposes/design feature that should work in my opinion.

Your kidding about the pinky test right? That's almost as bad as the whole "if a knives blade is larger than your palm it's illegal" myth...

ugly as sin imho....DD, POF, and a few others make very good looking brakes that both are effective and have the aggressive ends.

ugly as sin imho....

 

Agreed, Theres no way that I would put that on one of my rifles.  The original version looks 10x better.

Your kidding about the pinky test right? That's almost as bad as the whole "if a knives blade is larger than your palm it's illegal" myth...

According to Troppers at the NJSP Ballistics Unit, the "pinky test" is the best "guideline" out there for NJ residents.

 

NJ does not follow the federal definition of "Flash Hider" and does no measurements to see how much flash is suppressed by the device to determine if it qualifies as an evil feature or not.

 

They look at the title of the device, what the description of the device is, what it's primary attributes are as stated by the manufacturer, what the device is designed to do, and finally to see if the device is "open" at the end - If there isn't a closed end with an aperture slightly larger than the projectile be fired (or a "pinky") to pass through it is a flash hider.

 

You will never get a ruling or law on this, like so many things dealing woth firearms in NJ it is an "opinion".