http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gko_ghaHdM&safe=active

 

After seeing this, I come to believe vehicles are no more dangerious than a gun would be when controlled by a stupid person. Look at all the innocent people killed by vehicles while not even in one. Sounds like driver license's should be more regulated than gun permits.

 

 

Driving is a privilege. Owning a gun is your God given right!

 

 

Sent from my iPad 2 using T2 Pro

Driving is a privilege. Owning a gun is your God given right!

 

 

I'd actually say Constitutionally given right.....

 

That video was way over the top... over dramatic....

Constitution doesn't "give" rights. It merely "lists" them.

I'd actually say Constitutionally given right.....

 

That video was way over the top... over dramatic....

 ^yup

I agree about our rights. I just thought how much the anti's blame the guns for every gun related incidnent. But never have I heard any motor vehicle accident death be blamed on the vehicle itself. After all the years in EMS most deaths have been related to DWI or Careless/Reckless driving that I have cncountered.

I'd actually say Constitutionally given right.....

 

That video was way over the top... over dramatic....

I'd prefer natural or human right. Constitutionally-given infers that it can be Constitutionally-taken-away too.

And Joe Cryan wants to give illegals driver's licenses, but strip your rights. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2014/Bills/A2500/2135_I1.HTM

I'd prefer natural or human right. Constitutionally-given infers that it can be Constitutionally-taken-away too.

It can be taken away. Look at prohibition.

It can be taken away. Look at prohibition.

Which was susequentially repealed.

It can be taken away. Look at prohibition.

What God given, Constitutional, or natural right is drinking booze? Just curious, trying to understand how you're thinking.

The right of self protection is a natural right. It is protected by the constitution through the 2nd amendment, not given by it.

What God given, Constitutional, or natural right is drinking booze? Just curious, trying to understand how you're thinking.

Alcohol, which was previously legal to possess, was made illicit by the ratification of the 18th Amendment. On the contrary, the 18th Amendment was nullified by the 21st Amendment.

 

By mentioning prohibition I was inferring that you also have the right to bear arms as it is Constitutionally protected, but it could also be removed by amendment.

Alcohol, which was previously legal to possess, was made illicit by the ratification of the 18th Amendment. On the contrary, the 18th Amendment was nullified by the 21st Amendment.

By mentioning prohibition I was inferring that you also have the right to bear arms as it is Constitutionally protected, but it could also be removed by amendment.

I wouldn't worry about losing the 2A too much. It would need a 2/3 vote in both houses to pass. Even if Democrats were able to achieve that majority there are pro-2A Dems that would lose their seats if they voted that way. The first 10 Amendments were something several states wanted included in the Constitution in a way they are somewhat sacred.

And then even if it got that far 3/4 of the states need to ratify and that happenening is even less of a chance

And then even if it got that far 3/4 of the states need to ratify and that happenening is even less of a chance

True. After the 2/3 vote in both houses a new amendment require the ratification you mention.