News 4 just ran a segment on the news on how the SAFE act is literally cosmetic changes only to the firearm and only affect the comfort of the shooter. The removal of the "evil features" as they state have no difference on the effectiveness of the firearm. I cant find anything on their website regarding it yet but Im sure they will run it again later in the evening.

 

They were comparing an AR with a pistol grip to one with one of the featureless stocks, and call out how dumb the remaining evil features are as they only reduce the scary looking aspect of the firearm. 

 

This may be in the wrong section as its not NJ so mods please move if need be.

Wow mainstream media got it right?

I posted this earlier today on another thread:

 

"Do you know if it's NJ legal?  What a shame that we have to worry about BS stuff like that.  For the life of me, I still can't figure out how something like having a collapsible stock or bayonet lug makes a gun more dangerous."

 

Interesting to hear the MSM picking up on this.

I posted this earlier today on another thread:

 

"Do you know if it's NJ legal?  What a shame that we have to worry about BS stuff like that.  For the life of me, I still can't figure out how something like having a collapsible stock or bayonet lug makes a gun more dangerous."

 

Interesting to hear the MSM picking up on this.

Haven't you seen the reports of those drive by bayonetings? The last one was near the beginning of the WASHINGTON administration...

Great that they got this right. Unfortunately, I remember reading a Puffington Host article a while back reporting the same thing...then reaching the conclusion that, since the firepower is the same, these guns without evil features should also be banned. You just can't win with some people.

The Sullivan Act, implemented by the oligarch's in 1911, has withstood the test of time for more than a century. Being it's New York, I suspect the SAFE Act will follow suit and endure the same test of time. 

The Sullivan Act, implemented by the oligarch's in 1911, has withstood the test of time for more than a century. Being it's New York, I suspect the SAFE Act will follow suit and endure the same test of time. 

 

Interesting.

 

"Within 12 months of the passage of the Sullivan Act New York City's murder rate increased 18 percent."  From "Problems in a Free Society: Myths, Absurdities and Realities" by sociologist Myles J. Kelleher.

Good read. Who woulda thunk it.

Over one hundred years later and no lessons learned.

Haven't you seen the reports of those drive by bayonetings? The last one was near the beginning of the WASHINGTON administration...

F'ing Hilarious

FYI, here is the link to the video:

 

 

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/video/#!/investigations/video/After-NY-Gun-Law--Assault-Rifles-Only-Look-Different/258417721