June 2, 201412 yr If you haven't had the opportunity to see the recent short video on NJ.Con called "The gun lobby is right this time"? give it a glance...some good points made,some bad,ground gained and then lost towards the end of the video. I apologize for not linking the video but I'm seemingly blocked from linking anything on NJGF.
June 2, 201412 yr http://www.nj.com/ledgerlive/index.ssf/2014/06/the_gun_nuts_are_right_this_time_ledger_live_video.html#incart_river_default Anti 2A bias already oozing just looking at the text in the link.
June 2, 201412 yr Author http://www.nj.com/ledgerlive/index.ssf/2014/06/the_gun_nuts_are_right_this_time_ledger_live_video.html#incart_river_default Thank you Sir...
June 2, 201412 yr http://www.nj.com/ledgerlive/index.ssf/2014/06/the_gun_nuts_are_right_this_time_ledger_live_video.html#incart_river_default Anti 2A bias already oozing just looking at the text in the link. Yep... I don't think the intent of "common ground" was clear enough. And he did get his "anti" digs in at the end of the video. He seemed a little dismissive of the "home invasion" concern. That's never a good way to seek common ground with us pro-2A folks! And that BS about "I was glad i didn't have a gun [when I chased a home invader out with a baseball bat...]" All that speaks to is his own lack of control/discipline, and lack of "deadly force/justification" knowledge/training. I would hope that any responsible gun owner who chooses to possess weapons for HD/SD gets the appropriate "use of deadly force" training for their state. Otherwise, they are fair game for whatever the book throws at them.
June 2, 201412 yr They are afraid that if they knock it down too far, it won't withstand a court challenge and the whole thing will come crashing down.
June 2, 201412 yr The title of article uses "Gun Lobby" where as the link uses "Gun Nuts". "But unlike the partisans who make our laws, I spend my time (and video footage) trying to find common ground with those I generally disagree with. Even if it means a trip outside my comfort zone (ie the shooting range) for my first time.". B.S, just the way titles are named shows the "partisan" aspect of it. Grow a pair, stand your ground and call it what you like to call it, Mr. Donohue. Looks like Mr. Donohue is looking for some viewership. I would just delete this thread and not let him get another viewer. Whats the point, other than ad/viewer revenue ?
June 2, 201412 yr The title of article uses "Gun Lobby" where as the link uses "Gun Nuts". "But unlike the partisans who make our laws, I spend my time (and video footage) trying to find common ground with those I generally disagree with. Even if it means a trip outside my comfort zone (ie the shooting range) for my first time.". B.S, just the way titles are named shows the "partisan" aspect of it. Grow a pair, stand your ground and call it what you like to call it, Mr. Donohue. Looks like Mr. Donohue is looking for some viewership. I would just delete this thread and not let him get another viewer. Whats the point, other than ad/viewer revenue ? One other interesting point.... How old was the video footage he showed? It seems that he was interviewing Frank, but it also seemed that the B-Roll was of Donahue and Frank firing at Woodland Park Range (GFH). I had thought that Frank and GFH had "parted ways...." Did they kiss and make up?
June 2, 201412 yr Big deal. A video in which some points are not completely anti isn't much to cheer over. And yes, notice the URL says "gun nuts" even though they later retitled the piece "gun lobby."
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.