You cannot make this up:

 

http://njsp.org/news/pdf/rp_20141215_1354.pdf

 

 

As required by the foregoing Executive Order, the Division of State Police (Division), Department of Law and Public Safety, and the Attorney General have reviewed the rules and, with the exceptions noted below, have determined them to be necessary, reasonable, and proper for the purpose for which they were originally adopted. Accordingly, the Superintendent of the Division proposes to readopt N.J.A.C. 13:54 with amendments and new rules. 

 

*  *  *

 

The Division proposes to add “a change of sex” in the requirement to obtain a duplicate firearms purchaser identification card at N.J.A.C. 13:54-1.11(a),

 

 

 

Why is this so important to you?

Why is this so important to you?

 

Because it's not.

Because it's not.

 

But the thread  title says This is really important.

My head wants to explode after reading most of the 11 pages. I do not understand why these provisions are not challenged in court. By someone. Anyone.

 

 

But the thread  title says This is really important.

 

Товарищ, это сарказм

 

(Comrade, this is sarcasm)

Товарищ, это сарказм

 

(Comrade, this is sarcasm)

If it doesnt say that its sarcasm but instead "This is really important" then i understand it as its important.

 

The same way that you understand that a stripped reciever is not a firearms because it doesnt say it in the NJ Statutes.

 

 

The Division proposes to add “a change of sex” in the requirement to obtain a duplicate firearms purchaser identification card at N.J.A.C. 13:54-1.11(a),

 

I bet this really cuts down on the number of guys who try to get a duplicate card.

I bet this really cuts down on the number of guys who try to get a duplicate card.

Chicks with guns

My head wants to explode after reading most of the 11 pages. I do not understand why these provisions are not challenged in court. By someone. Anyone.

Because are NJ gun rights group(s) are more concerned with suing NH over their carry laws. And demanding local PD's to strictly adhere to unconstitutional laws instead of actually challenging the constitutionality of the laws themselves.