http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/10/15/gavin-newsom-gun-control-initiative/73971800/

 

Hold onto your butts. The Lt. Governor of CA is trying to bypass the legislature by means of a ballot question. Background checks for ammo purchases, remove grandfathering for mags over 10 rounds, and force felons to turn in their illegal firearms (). If such asshattery passes muster I'd expect to see something like that coming soon from Sweenscum.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/10/15/gavin-newsom-gun-control-initiative/73971800/

 

Hold onto your butts. The Lt. Governor of CA is trying to bypass the legislature by means of a ballot question. Background checks for ammo purchases, remove grandfathering for mags over 10 rounds, and force felons to turn in their illegal firearms ( ). If such asshattery passes muster I'd expect to see something like that coming soon from Sweenscum.

That is really funny!  "FORCE FELONS TO TURN IN THEIR ILLEGAL FIREARMS"  HA Ha HA

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/10/15/gavin-newsom-gun-control-initiative/73971800/

 

Hold onto your butts. The Lt. Governor of CA is trying to bypass the legislature by means of a ballot question. Background checks for ammo purchases, remove grandfathering for mags over 10 rounds, and force felons to turn in their illegal firearms ( ). If such asshattery passes muster I'd expect to see something like that coming soon from Sweenscum.

Don't worry, everything that passes via a vote in commifornia gets overturned in the courts.  But I am sure it will happen here first...Oh wait, we already don't have grandfathering and have to pass a background check for pistol ammo, it's called an FPID.  See, told you it would happen here first. 

Man I'm sure the felons are going to turn in their illegal weapons in droves

Yeah, we pretty much have all that in place here already.  Just update 15 rounds to 10 and you seem to have it.

 

Ah, California, just like my breakfast cereal, whatever ain't fruits and nuts, are flakes.  Let's see those crime stats two years after this goes through.  Not much left but an outright ban left for shakeytown.

Felons must relinquish weapons: California courts would set up a clear process to relinquish weapons. The authors say that more than 17,000 Californians who are prohibited from owning firearms currently have guns.

I'm sure every gang banger will run right out to turn them in.

Yep....there lining up now....lol

That is really funny!  "FORCE FELONS TO TURN IN THEIR ILLEGAL FIREARMS"  HA Ha HA

Yeah, exactly how do you do that?  If that were possible you wouldn't really need any other gun restrictions right?  After all why would you need any law on guns if only law abiding citizens have them?

 

When will numbnuts that make laws understand only non-criminals follow laws?  

I wonder if they would attack reloading.

I wonder if they would attack reloading.

NJ already has enough noose in the law to hang otherwise law abiding citizens.

 

If you moved to NJ with your legal handgun and reload ammo in NJ without satisfying 2C:58-3.3, I can see some NJ Prosecutor stretching the "acquire" and "constructive possession" for their career. 

 

Dont be surprised if CA does it too.. 

 

2C:58-3.3 

 

b.No person shall sell, give, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of, or receive, purchase, or otherwise acquire handgun ammunition unless the purchaser, assignee, donee, receiver or holder is licensed as a manufacturer, wholesaler, or dealer under this chapter or is the holder of and possesses a valid firearms purchaser identification card, a valid copy of a permit to purchase a handgun, or a valid permit to carry a handgun and first exhibits such card or permit to the seller, donor, transferor or assignor.

"Felons must relinquish weapons"

 

someone finally figured it out!!!

 

just when i thought i was on he right planet...

Why didn't they think of this sooner

"or a valid permit to carry a handgun " does that include the ones we can get such as Florida or Utah?

Fat chance

Why didn't they think of this sooner

They did. Its called Co Operation among Commie States or simply, COCS  Accord of 1960s.  NJ makes some, CA make some more, NY, IL, MD pitches in....  

 

They all go on a People Interest Safety System contest. 

 

Little illegal admin code here, little unconstitutional law there, few years later they all become "long standing rules that stood test of time" as SCOTUS would so eloquently put them. 

"or a valid permit to carry a handgun " does that include the ones we can get such as Florida or Utah?

Ask 2C:58-4. Permits to carry handguns :-)

If passed, this will not stand up to court challenges. You cannot make it "cost prohibitive" for a citizen to exercise their rights as outlined in the US Constitution. It's akin to a poll tax.

If passed, this will not stand up to court challenges. You cannot make it "cost prohibitive" for a citizen to exercise their rights as outlined in the US Constitution. It's akin to a poll tax.

The burden is being put on the dealers. And NICS is free from courts perspective. Courts did nothing about NJ (and other states) charging for POC checks. Why would they do anything about ammo ?

The courts couldn't care less if they tried