Today's article in the National Review looks at the very broad answer to that question, as well as a number of relevant historical and constitutional issues. Perhaps you have heard them all before, but there may still be a few nuggets in here you haven't picked up yet. I also thought his arguments were well structured.

 

And, at the very end, New Jersey gets an honorable mention as the 'draconian' state that it is, with a prime example that you all know.

 

Happy New Year.

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429132/self-defense-second-amendment

Good read.

Everyone should read that article regardless of how you feel about guns.

A good article that will unfortunately not be read by the people that should read it.

45Doll, you post some good articles.  Wish I could remember all those historical facts when I'm talking to some of the antis.

 

And yes, isn't it an embarrassing tragedy that our state is held up as an example of what's wrong with firearms laws. 

Thanx OGG. I have the same problem, that's why I keep reading up. I do save hard or digital copies of some really good ones (like this) to refresh my mind when necessary. Like when I'm going into enemy territory. 

 

I realized quite a while ago I don't have an exclusive lock on all the pro 2A or firearm arguments. I need periodic refresh.

Great read.....Thank you

Good read. 

Charles C W Cooke is on FoxNews a lot.

He's a smart guy.

Good article

A good article that will unfortunately not be read by the people that should read it.

+1

 

Regardless, thanks 45Doll. Good stuff.

Very good read. Thank you for sharing,