January 28, 20179 yr This article discusses a recent decision from the 4th Circuit Court Of Appeals. The fundamental issue is: if you are armed, have you given up your rights against illegal searches? This court says you have. The NRA sent this out in their bulletin today, but I also found this discussion and it's links enlightening. If you are legally carrying, you may be automatically and legally judged to be 'dangerous'. This should not be allowed to stand.
January 28, 20179 yr Haven't had time to read the piece yet, but your summary is very concerning. What area does the 4th circuit cover?
January 28, 20179 yr Here's another view of the case decision. The Fourth Circuit has not been known to render gun friendly decisions http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/01/u-s-v-robinson-have-concealed-carriers-lost-the-4th-amendment/
January 28, 20179 yr Author And here's the NRA-ILA summary, for those of you who don't get their email updates. Should have included that before.
January 30, 20179 yr Here's another view of the case decision. The Fourth Circuit has not been known to render gun friendly decisions http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/01/u-s-v-robinson-have-concealed-carriers-lost-the-4th-amendment I read the article as saying its a bad decision, but that's ok because this guy was a bad guy. Not how I think about the law.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.