https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/12/22/ruger-announces-security-9-double-stack-pistol/

 

The stupid fucking safety ruins it.

 

 

51 minutes ago, Scorpio64 said:

 

 

I hope that's his aim that sucks and not the gun. I'd probably strip down the gun and take that external safety off. Safety first. 

You lost me at the manual safety and Glockish sights.

$389 MSRP?  Hmm.... It is kinda ugly.  Wonder if it has double strike capability since it's hammer fired...

56 minutes ago, Krdshrk said:

$389 MSRP?  Hmm.... It is kinda ugly.  Wonder if it has double strike capability since it's hammer fired...

I'm sure there will be future models without that horrific one sided safety and upgraded sights but as of now, no thanks. 

Fugly

There are plenty of people in 'Merica looking for a low end pistol and with a street price of around 3 bills they will sell a shit ton of them. Look out Kel Tec.  When you can walk into a store and buy without extensive delays, paperwork, fingerprints, and permits, people tend to buy good reliable low end guns more often.

17 hours ago, T Bill said:

When you can walk into a store and buy without extensive delays, paperwork, fingerprints, and permits, people tend to buy good reliable low end guns more often.

Yup

That's why the Taurus PT111 sells like hot cakes all over.

On 12/24/2017 at 5:58 PM, Krdshrk said:

$389 MSRP?  Hmm.... It is kinda ugly.  Wonder if it has double strike capability since it's hammer fired...

It seems to use the LCP II internal hammer mechanism - so it would be an internal hammer that is single action only.

2 hours ago, Catch22LR said:

It seems to use the LCP II internal hammer mechanism - so it would be an internal hammer that is single action only.

Double action only

Double Strike Capability. Another useless feature on a SA.  TAP RACK BANG. or plan on dropping that mag and clearing the jam because no amount of useless trigger clicking is going to work.