probably the wrong place for this, but i gotta ask.........the recent ruling about online sports betting. friend of mine believes that that ruling re-afirms the 10th, and in so doing, creates a better landscape for challenges against illegal firearms laws in places like here in nj.

 what's your guys opinions?

It doesn't hurt, but I think the landscape would be more scenic with two (or three) Trump SC appointments.

Scalia's "common use for lawful purposes"pretty much covers it all. The SC hears about 1% of the cases it's asked to. It can't take every crazy liberal judge who applies emotion over logic to a case by the hand. It doesn't have enough time.

I don't think I really want the SC to hear another firearms case with its current makeup. After Kennedy and Ginsburg retire.