So lets say someone in PA ordered 30 round magazines from Florida... and during the transport to PA they pass through NJ.. is the driver technically in violation of the law while going through NJ with those magazines?

Its not really an important question.. more just one of curiosity.... 

15 minutes ago, vladtepes said:

So lets say someone in PA ordered 30 round magazines from Florida... and during the transport to PA they pass through NJ.. is the driver technically in violation of the law while going through NJ with those magazines?

Its not really an important question.. more just one of curiosity.... 

Falls under transport. Legal at origin, legal at destination. Cmon guy! You know this.

plus there’s probably some interstate commerce thing I’m missing also

4 minutes ago, Zeke said:

Falls under transport. Legal at origin, legal at destination. Cmon guy! You know this.

plus there’s probably some interstate commerce thing I’m missing also

I will have to read it again... but I am not totally convinced it would cover magazines... MAYBE some interstate commerce thing.. 

FedEx drivers are constantly breaking the law when they have deliveries of handguns on their trucks on their way to the FFLs for delivery.

FedEx drivers are constantly breaking the law when they have deliveries of handguns on their trucks on their way to the FFLs for delivery.

I believe that is different as they are a common carrier. They also transport machine guns through NJ.

Honestly, I have no clue regarding mags.

Sent from an undisclosed location via Tapatalk

6 minutes ago, PK90 said:

I believe that is different as they are a common carrier. They also transport machine guns through NJ.

Honestly, I have no clue regarding mags.

Sent from an undisclosed location via Tapatalk
 

Well mags aren’t firearms according to atf

4 minutes ago, Zeke said:

Well mags aren’t firearms according to atf

But they are "arms" according to some federal courts.

2 minutes ago, DirtyDigz said:

But they are "arms" according to some federal courts.

This is becoming a ridiculous argument,. Jeebus you guys should shoot more and seriously knock this crap off.

name courts. Fake news

Common carrier is exempt under interstate commerce.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

13 minutes ago, capt14k said:

Common carrier is exempt under interstate commerce.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

THIS^^^^

 

I recall something about common carriers can't be held responsible for what is in the packages unless they were involved in some sort of criminal conspiracy to deliver something illegally. Otherwise a UPS driver could be charged with drug smuggling for unknowingly delivering a package to someone with drugs in it.