coming out soon any idea if the NJ lords will allow?

 

https://magpul.com/firearm-accessories/pistol-brace-bsl.html

1 hour ago, Tallday said:

coming out soon any idea if the NJ lords will allow?

 

https://magpul.com/firearm-accessories/pistol-brace-bsl.html

Cool.....X

Fun......X

Practical........X

 

Never be allowed in NJ.

3 minutes ago, Danno said:

Never be allowed in NJ.

It's a brace, not a stock.

On a side note, it looks like the blade brace that noone likes. 

1 hour ago, Ray Ray said:

It's a brace, not a stock.

On a side note, it looks like the blade brace that noone likes. 

thats exactly what it looks like.. 

1 hour ago, Ray Ray said:

It's a brace, not a stock.

On a side note, it looks like the blade brace that noone likes. 

I think it looks better then the blade JMO

Looks terrible to me. Sba3 alllllll day

SBA4 looks best...

 

SBA3 ... No

SBA4 ... No

M4 Stock on an SBR ... Yes

 ...  ...

 

 

 

 

5 hours ago, Tallday said:

coming out soon any idea if the NJ lords will allow?

 

https://magpul.com/firearm-accessories/pistol-brace-bsl.html

Allow on What?

 

Sorry I thought we were talking about "others"  

On 4/10/2020 at 8:28 PM, JT Custom Guns said:

Allow on What?

 

on "other" firearm 

Will be good for Non-NFAs.

I prefer the look and feel of the BTR.  Got to handle it at SHOT Show as well as the BSL.

https://magpul.com/firearm-accessories/pistolbrace-btr.html

BSL is definitely "bladey" - the BTR is a bit nicer in feel.  However - If you're looking for a tight fit, neither of these braces are very "tight" against the buffer.

8 minutes ago, Krdshrk said:

Will be good for Non-NFAs.

I prefer the look and feel of the BTR.  Got to handle it at SHOT Show as well as the BSL.

https://magpul.com/firearm-accessories/pistolbrace-btr.html

BSL is definitely "bladey" - the BTR is a bit nicer in feel.  However - If you're looking for a tight fit, neither of these braces are very "tight" against the buffer.

By not a tight fit do you mean wobbly?

6 minutes ago, ChrisJM981 said:

By not a tight fit do you mean wobbly?

Well that's the opposite of a tight stock fit... They seemed a bit wobbly/rattley to me but again they were not actual production models.

1 hour ago, Krdshrk said:

Well that's the opposite of a tight stock fit... They seemed a bit wobbly/rattley to me but again they were not actual production models.

So why didn't you say that? Geez. I'll stick with my SBA3 and A4. There's already wobble between my upper and lower. No reason to add more.

1 hour ago, ChrisJM981 said:

So why didn't you say that? Geez. I'll stick with my SBA3 and A4. There's already wobble between my upper and lower. No reason to add more.

Reading comprehension is key.  A "loose fit" denotes wobbly....

22 minutes ago, Krdshrk said:

Reading comprehension is key.  A "loose fit" denotes wobbly....

Point of order - This is not a reading comprehension issue, you described it poorly. I couldn't tell what you meant either.

You said:

3 hours ago, Krdshrk said:

BSL is definitely "bladey" - the BTR is a bit nicer in feel.  However - If you're looking for a tight fit, neither of these braces are very "tight" against the buffer.

That doesn't mean anything. Neither brace has any contact with the buffer. 

A stock or brace is fitted to the receiver extension (commonly mislabeled as a "buffer tube). The buffer is inside the receiver extension and is affixed to one end of the action spring (commonly mislabeled as a "buffer spring").

The statement "Tight against the buffer" makes no sense.

Slap!!!

1 hour ago, High Exposure said:

Point of order - This is not a reading comprehension issue, you described it poorly. I couldn't tell what you meant either.

You said:

That doesn't mean anything. Neither brace has any contact with the buffer. 

A stock or brace is fitted to the receiver extension (commonly mislabeled as a "buffer tube). The buffer is inside the receiver extension and is affixed to one end of the action spring (commonly mislabeled as a "buffer spring").

The statement "Tight against the buffer" makes no sense.

Hah you got me there - I did mean buffer tube, not the buffer itself.

17 minutes ago, Krdshrk said:

Hah you got me there - I did mean buffer tube, not the buffer itself.

What's a "buffer tube"?

Ohhhhh. You mean "receiver extension". 

3 minutes ago, PK90 said:

What's a "buffer tube"?

Ohhhhh. You mean "receiver extension". 

Potato Tomato

1 hour ago, Krdshrk said:

Potato Tomato

I call it da tube also. F those perfect people 

I call it infringement 

On 4/15/2020 at 5:42 PM, Ray Ray said:

I call it infringement 

Joe Biden calls that 'the thing'.