Does anyone know for sure if this is NJ legal/complaint?

https://grabagun.com/firearms/handguns/semi-automatic-handguns/ruger-pc-charger-state-compliant-9mm-6-5-barrel-10-rounds.html

I am guessing no, but wanted to check.

Nope.  

It's got 4 strikes against it since it's a Pistol.

• (1) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;
• (2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer;
• (3) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned;
• (4) Manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded

Even if you got rid of the threaded barrel and shroud, the weight is still way over.

cant wait to move out of this state!!!

 

1 hour ago, Krdshrk said:

Nope.  

It's got 4 strikes against it since it's a Pistol.

• (1) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;
• (2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer;
• (3) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned;
• (4) Manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded

Even if you got rid of the threaded barrel and shroud, the weight is still way over.

None of these restrictions makes any sense to me.

1 hour ago, CMJeepster said:

None of these restrictions makes any sense to me.

None of the provisions of NJ's AWB (spread between 2C:39 and 2C:58) make any sense.

They don't stop criminals (or potential criminals) from doing ANYTHING.

They only affect the law-abiding. It's so much easier to control the behavior of the law-abiding than the criminals.

12 minutes ago, njJoniGuy said:

None of the provisions of NJ's AWB (spread between 2C:39 and 2C:58) make any sense.

They don't stop criminals (or potential criminals) from doing ANYTHING.

They only affect the law-abiding. It's so much easier to control the behavior of the law-abiding than the criminals.

I agree with all of what you are saying.  My statement goes back to the idea that if any or all of those things were legal, it wouldn't cause an uptick in crimes where a firearm is used.

None of it makes sense because...The state passed a law that banned 60 firearms by name and then said that any firearm that was "substantially identical" was also banned.  Somebody went to court and argued that "substantially identical" can't be defined.  Who knows if a firearm is "substantially identical" to another firearm.  The court agreed and let the AG write a better definition of "substantially identical".   This is what the AG came up with and the Judge allowed it.