CJack

For a small fee of 250+ an hour, sign me up. I will do pascal, fortran, basic, assembler and anything else they might need .. LOL

Now that we are past major hurdle (of justifiable need), lets talk about potential costs. Looking at the RPO process just as a guide line: 1. Yearly renewal application fees ($50 +) 2. Qualification/Certification twice a year ($250+?) 3. Fingerprinting fees with every renewal ($100?) So we are looking at around $500 (plus whatever the NJ is going to throw when the dust settles) every year for the privilege of exercising a Constitutional Right ? https://www.nj.gov/njsp/firearms/firearms-faqs.shtml

Acknowledging this is a Govt we are talking about and NJ nonetheless, isnt RPO permit process already electronic ?

The instructions as of now are at the link (NJSP) below. Note that they are NOT updated to reflect the SCOTUS decision. "Written proof of qualification and ownership with the handgun(s) you intend on carrying if your application is approved. This must be recent at the time of the application and must also be obtained from a certified firearms instructor." .. https://www.nj.gov/njsp/firearms/pdf/Permit_to_Carry_Instructions_v1.pdf

Murphy already said it, and I am 100% they are all colluding on this one, they will make the 'no carry' into public buildings and default no-carry onto private businesses. That means, business has to post "Carry Here", which 99.9999% of the businesses in NJ and NYC will NOT do. And just like they did with COVID, the anti scumbags will also work the insurance angle. Any business that will post "Carry Here" will end up with hefty premiums because "of increase risk". Usually, this type of garbage could be taken care of with short lawsuits at state level. But, knowing the liberal cesspool of the judicial system in this state, that will take another 15 years and scores of people going to jail and permanently prevented from exercising their 2A ever again.

Whats the penalty for violating SCOTUS ruling ? Whats the penalty for purposely circumventing SCOTUS ruling repeatedly ? Who enforces SCOTUS rulings ?

I don't like the court recognizing the existing laws regulating the existing "sensitive areas" - govt buildings, schools etc. Thats what NJ and other anti-2A is going to go. Ray of hope is caution in the ruling about expanding that too broadly. But then again, "too broadly" is subject to interpretation and gonna take another 15 years for another case to go all the way to SCOTUS and who knows what by then. ---------- quote from ruling ------ But expanding the category of “sensitive places” simply to all places of public congregation that are not isolated from law enforcement defines the cat- egory of “sensitive places” far too broadly.

I dont see how/why SP642 requires the references to be present at the Notary. Notary is about the applicant.