ESB

@Spartiati any insight into this? 2 hours ago, DirtyDigz said: Because it was a Delaware law that was challenged and enjoined, not a NJ law.

I think that it also covers if you accidently expose for example while reaching up to get something on the top shelf at a store. Vs exposing on purpose to intimidate anyone.

Bruen was a NY law that was challenged but effected NJ and other states...

How does that not effect NJ ghost gun law?

Looking to pick up an EDC folder as well a camping/survival knife. Any laws or rules I need to be aware of? Either on the knives themselves or how I carry them?

If they cashed your Money Order, it has a docket number. That means its before the courts. Good news is that before this legislation, only the PD had a 60 day timeframe or it was automatically approved. This did not apply to the courts. Once to the courts they could sit on it indefinitely. Now the courts also have a 60 day timeframe (probably from when they receive it)...

Kinda. Gun owners are a small portion of NJ tax payers. Given the makeup of NJ politicians I would guess the majority in NJ is Dems. The silver lining is that means Dems just paid for us to get our Freedom back!

Link to Delaware issue?

This really is great news for us. We got the judge who already smacked the State around and already ruled in 2A's favor vs a Biden apointee judge. It's certainly far from over and nothing is set in stone, but the alternative was worse, so this really is the best outcome at this juncture. Def having a celebratory drink tonight.

"The homeowner's gun is legal and authorities are not filing charges since his action seemed to be justified." Also check out the linked video at the 1:40 mark.

He's going to have to explain the 4 extra shots after the guy was down and the gun flew out of the perp's hands. Plus the extra one at the end. Up until then it looks very justified, the last one looks vigilante. I think this is going to come down to how good his lawyer is and if the DA wants to make an example out of him.

Replies to the briefs are here. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.anjrpc.org/resource/resmgr/legal_motions___briefs/doc_28_-_011123_-_plaintiffs.pdf https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.anjrpc.org/resource/resmgr/legal_motions___briefs/doc_27_-_011123_-_defendants.pdf The State seems to have put a lot more effort into this one. They are fighting tooth and nail to consolidate the cases under Williams and not Bumb. Very telling on multiple fronts.

So I am almost done with it. Its a normal sized backpack with 3 zipped main compartments, large, medium and small. Was able to get almost everything to fit. Won't be able to fit sneakers/boots. Total weight of the bag is 18lbs. Most of the stuff is small, just a lot of it.

Here are the 2 new briefs from Seigel. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.anjrpc.org/resource/resmgr/legal_motions___briefs/doc_26_-_011023_-_plaintiffs.pdf https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.anjrpc.org/resource/resmgr/legal_motions___briefs/doc_25_-_011023_-_defendants.pdf https://www.anjrpc.org/page/CarryLawsuitFilings The most interesting thing is that the plaintiffs give very valid reasons for not Consolidating Koons into Siegel under Williams (both plaintiffs do not want that), but give good arguments for consolidating Siegel into Koons under Bumb (no idea if Koons wants that). The State's brief also gives good reason to consolidate, however those reasons would only be valid if Siegel was consolidated into Koons under Bumb. But the very last line says Koons should be consolidated into Siegel. We can only hope and pray that Williams will consolidate Siegel into Koons under Bumb. It would certainly be helpful if Koons was not opposed to that, yet remain opposed to consolidating Koons into Siegel under Williams.

I thought the same until they refused to Vacate the Stay on the TRO. Vacating the Stay would have put the 2nd Circuit on notice, but SCOTUS did not do that.

Is seems to me in my IANAL, that if they aren't contradictory then that means one law is for how to get the permit and the other applies to when you already have it. Ie in order to get your permit, you must submit quals with all of the guns you intend to CCW with. Once you have your permit it covers all handguns you own. So technically if you go out and buy a new gun after you got your permit, it would be lawful for you to carry it since at the time you got your permit you did not own it therefor could not have known you would ever intend to use it at the time you got your permit.

State Sen. Neil Anderson expects a legal challenge and an immediate stay on implementation if the measure is approved with an immediate effective date. Supporting what he said is a violation of the Second Amendment right to bear arms is a violation of elected officials’ oath, he said. “All of us are going to raise our right hand [Wednesday with the 103rd General Assembly] and pledge an oath to uphold the constitution of Illinois and the constitution of the United States,” Anderson said. “All of you thinking about voting for this today, you should resign.” Senate President Don Harmon (D) expects the legal battle. Harmon said. “We’ll see you in court.” Lets hope that in the upcoming cases, the Supreme Court reminds these officials, in writing, that they took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and that writing, passing, and enforcing these unconstitutional laws they are violating their oath and perjuring themselves.

Really, REALLY hope that if consolidated that Bumb takes the case and not Williams. Bumb seems to understand what is going on, the gravity of it, and is taking it seriously. Plus just bitched slapped the State. Williams seems uneducated on the law (thought it doesn't take effect until June 2023???), doesn't plan on doing any homework until the morning of, and worse of all, is a Biden appointee.

That's a plus and a minus for condensed. Yeah, you need water and if a SHTF situation water might be hard to come by. But you should have a plan for water. On the other hand condensed takes up a lot less space and is cheaper which is probably the 2 biggest factors in stock piling. They are also lighter in case you want to throw them in a backpack.

It seems like the clerk shot the armed robber (and a bystander) after the robber got the money and was leaving. If true, it seems to me that the armed robber was no longer a threat to the clerk since he was leaving and the clerk was not justified in shooting.

Anyone worried that a Biden appointee is hearing the Siegel case? The latest SCOTUS judge Biden appointed was an activist judge who ruled not necessarily based on constitutionality or law but what would push forward the leftist agenda best she could. Williams could rule against 2A freedoms to be seen as an activist judge who promotes leftist agendas in hopes of a bigger promotion by Dems.

Check out the video reviews of this 1-6X LVPO with ACSS Raptor first focal plane reticle. Primary Arms SLx 1-6x24mm FFP Rifle Scope - Illuminated ACSS-RAPTOR-5.56/.308

Campbell's Condensed is 10 for $10.

Please see this thread here for info and links to groups we should support because they are fighting for our rights! Please consider joining or donating if you aren't currently. Which org to support to fight for our 2A rights in NJ. - Legislative Alerts and Rallies - New Jersey Gun Forums (njgunforums.com)

Good point. And may be on purpose in order to lay the grounds for Biden to expand the SCOTUS (as he implied he might during his election campaign) so he can appoint a liberal majority.