ESB

Can anyone give us the Cliff Notes of whats happening.

Even ones with wrist support?

"The biggest factor is we're using more and more electricity as a country. Think of all the devices we all use every day now. Cloud computing, AI—that's all using more and more electricity," Matheson said. "At the same time, we haven't been replacing it by building more capacity to generate electricity. In fact, we've been closing down power plants that had useful life left in them, both gas plants and coal plants, and that means we're digging a deeper hole." Matheson added that while renewable energy sources will need to be part of the solution, they aren't currently able to meet the energy demand. "Wind doesn't blow 24 hours a day. The sun doesn't shine 24 hours a day. You need to make sure you have that always-available generating capacity during these peak moments. That's really the danger we see coming into this winter—demand is growing, supply hasn't kept up," he told the outlet. How do they not even mention EV vehicles and charging stations as well as new/future bans on small engines and gas stoves etc, requiring even more power hungry electric devices!

The funny/sad thing is this is legal in NJ: And this is not legal in NJ:

Widespread Blackouts Predicted for 2024—Will They Hit Your Region? (msn.com) The report, produced by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), says that as we head into 2024, North Americans can expect more frequent and prolonged power outages.

Run as a Democrat and promise free shit and make statements that can't possibly be true.

I don't feel like going through a metal detector and then dealing with the extra nonsense that will lead to.

So if you are a witness to a minor car accident, when you give your statement, do you have to disclose to the officer then?

Congrats! You just made the point of why gun registration is dangerous and illegal! Now to go after them and their Database. 18 USC 926(a)(3): “No such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established.” However, the National Firearms Act of 1934 requires registration of several categories of firearms, such as fully-automatics.

Can you carry a firearm in your car in South Carolina? | TheGunZone "In South Carolina, you can carry a firearm in your car without a permit, as long as it is secured in a closed glove compartment, console, or trunk." Can I carry a firearm in my car if I am not a resident of South Carolina? If you are legally allowed to possess a firearm in your home state, you can carry it in your car while traveling through South Carolina. Can I carry a firearm in my car if it is not secured? No, if the firearm is not secured in a closed glove compartment, console, or trunk, you will need to have a valid permit to carry it in your vehicle. Can I carry a firearm in my car if it is located in a holster? If you have a valid concealed weapons permit, you can carry a firearm in your car in a holster on your person.

My understanding from what father-of-three said above is that anyone who can legally own a handgun can carry in their vehicle in SC. You do not need a CWP from any state to carry in your vehicle in SC. Not sure what happens if you have to get out to pump gas or something, do you have to secure it inside the vehicle? Keep one foot in the vehicle while you pump... UPDATE: See below. Basically, without a SC CWP, you can only transport a firearm in a similar manner as you would under FOPA, with the exception that the gun may be loaded and a locked glovebox is an acceptable location. You CANNOT carry it on your person without a SC CWP.

NJSP has received Federal Funds so should be subject to that law. Here is an example... AG Platkin and the New Jersey State Police Announce $800,000 in Federal Grant Funding to Expand Operation Helping Hand to Aid Those Battling Substance Use Disorders - New Jersey Office of Attorney General (njoag.gov)

Actually this also covers them preventing us from carrying too. Text of H.R. 5013 (109th): Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006 (Referred to Senate Committee version) - GovTrack.us SEC. 706. FIREARMS POLICIES. (a) Prohibition on Confiscation of Firearms- No officer or employee of the United States (including any member of the uniformed services), or person operating pursuant to or under color of Federal law, or receiving Federal funds, or under control of any Federal official, or providing services to such an officer, employee, or other person, while acting in support of relief from a major disaster or emergency, may-- `(1) temporarily or permanently seize, or authorize seizure of, any firearm the possession of which is not prohibited under Federal, State, or local law, other than for forfeiture in compliance with Federal law or as evidence in a criminal investigation; `(2) require registration of any firearm for which registration is not required by Federal, State, or local law; `(3) prohibit possession of any firearm, or promulgate any rule, regulation, or order prohibiting possession of any firearm, in any place or by any person where such possession is not otherwise prohibited by Federal, State, or local law; or `(4) prohibit the carrying of firearms by any person otherwise authorized to carry firearms under Federal, State, or local law, solely because such person is operating under the direction, control, or supervision of a Federal agency in support of relief from the major disaster or emergency. Looks like they are not protected and you can sue them if they violate your rights: `(c) Private Rights of Action- `(1) IN GENERAL- Any individual aggrieved by a violation of this section may seek relief in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress against any person who subjects such individual, or causes such individual to be subjected, to the deprivation of any of the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by this section. `(2) REMEDIES- In addition to any existing remedy in law or equity, under any law, an individual aggrieved by the seizure or confiscation of a firearm in violation of this section may bring an action for return of such firearm in the United States district court in the district in which that individual resides or in which such firearm may be found. `(3) ATTORNEY FEES- In any action or proceeding to enforce this section, the court shall award the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs.'. Search for 706 in the below link. This bill was passed into law. The one linked above was not passed into law, but added to this one: Text of H.R. 5441 (109th): Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2007 (Passed Congress version) - GovTrack.us

It could damage your extractor. Its not designed to be run that way. I damaged the extractor in my 1911 dropping rounds into the chamber and releasing the slide. I started getting failure to ejects. Had to send it back to get fixed. I don't see why a striker fired pistol would not have the same issue. The extractor design and function isn't really different between the 2.

I know the question is about carrying, but this is relevant: After guns were illegally confiscated during Katrina... In 2006, Congress passed the DISASTER RECOVERY PERSONAL PROTECTION ACT.

I wonder if the declined to take it up because the plan on combining a bunch of challenges into one?

Duplicate

Why do I have to say anything unless asked? And then shouldn't still have the right to remain silent? What happens if I don't tell them upfront?

How does duty to inform not violate your 5th amendment rights? Taking away your 2nd amendment rights because you exercised your 5th amendment rights would violate the 2nd amendment.

I have one that I am looking to sell. PM Sent.

Dems are trying very hard to get Clarence Thomas off right now. They also attack Barret and Kavanaugh every chance they get. They have also floated the idea of increasing the size of the Supreme Court in order to pack and take control of Judicial branch. They have floated the idea of making Washington DC and Puerto Rico states which would give them permanent control of the Legislative branch. They have floated the idea of going to popular vote for elections and are finding ways to allow immigrants and felons to be able to vote, giving them permanent control over the Executive branch. They want total control and will do anything to get it. The fact that they are doing whatever they can to get full control over all 3 branches of the government should scare you. They aren't doing it for our best interest, and likely want to do something they could not do unless they had complete control.

If you want to download and save the PDF in a secure location and print them out here are some links to books I could find. 667 Free Survival PDFs, Manuals and Downloads [Updated 2024 ] (seasonedcitizenprepper.com) SAS. Survival. Handbook. 2nd. Edition (archive.org) 4Patriots-Ultimate-Survival-Handbook.pdf NCScout The Guerrilla's Guide To The Baofeng Radio ( 2022) (archive.org) I'll update this as I find more.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/appeals-court-strikes-down-parts-of-ccw-law-in-california/ar-AA1mFhdU

Honestly the scariest part of this is that this is really just Latitia James trying to get notoriety in order to get appointed to a much higher position. Imagine her in a higher position of authority and the abuse of power that will entail.

An Oregon Judge Enters the Final Order Striking Down a Voter-Approved Gun Control Law (usnews.com) "The judgment finalizes the opinion Raschio issued in November finding the law violated the right to bear arms under the Oregon Constitution. The law, one of the toughest in the nation, was among the first gun restrictions to be passed after a major U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year changed the guidance judges are expected to follow when considering Second Amendment cases. ...It also bans high-capacity magazines."