Spdracr

No the judge has no choice if requirements are met!

You are saying there are 3 people with those exact restrictions posted in the above court order?

There's definitely more to it than simply the judge wanted to make up rules. Everyone seems to agree that this might be a work related permit. Gotta remember not every gun owner will be applying to carry a gun as some of them don't feel the need for it or don't feel comfortable carrying etc...

Read two comments above yours.

read the following a bit more carefully: ORDERED, that in the event the applicant is employed at a "sensitive place" and his employer requires that person to be armed, then during hours of employment the applicant shall not be prihibited from carrying the firearm, and it is further." i would read that as this permit is work specific. otherwise those restrictions are BS and in violation of the Bruen ruling.

yes scroll back few pages and you will one that was just posted showing one handgun and plenty of space below for few more.

really there should no restriction or limit on how many handguns you are allowed to carry but for now each county is issuing them as they see fit. eventually it will all get changed. i have only ever seen permits with two handguns listed on the back and never saw 3.

Day 61 the application at the local PD is deemed approved and must go to the court for the next and final step which is to get approved.

That's impressive timeline if you ask me. My PD is still in possession of my application. Clocking in 3 weeks today from when I handed it in. Your PD must have moved it along quickly or the court is moving along as soon as they receive them.

So it's not a zoom meeting anymore. Do you mind emailing this to the strike force team? They're aware of the delays by the gloucester county courts and trying to gather as much info as possible about it to help us get it changed.

I totally agree. The more applications that are submitted the better. It will flood the courts and the judges will be overwhelmed. At that point they'll be forced to take action and make a change. The cost could be a deciding factor to some and that's totally understandable. But the ones that sit and complain about the restrictions and the what ifs associated with carrying. My breakdown of the whole process is as follows: Qualification: $107 Fingerprints: $58 Money order: $50 Notary: $10 50 rounds of ammo: $20 Total: $245 I encourage anyone who is willing to carry to apply sooner than later as it will help us with our battle in fixing a broken system.

I can understand that may be the case for out of state applicants. The problem is that there is lots of false information flying around and people gobbling it up and believing every word of it.

If that's truly the case then that's great news. It's not often at all that you hear about njsp being cooperative when it comes to gun ownership and even some local municipalities

An overwhelmed department has the time to do am initial application review to catch errors then a final review after correcting errors? You must really not live in NJ or not follow what has been happening recently with most PDs stalling and refusing to process applications and settings obstacles along the way to discourage citizens from applying.

Anyone that stated that they emailed their application is lying. All applications are required to be notarized. Emailing them defeats the purpose of verifying authenticity. Variation in court is due to lack of clarity on the court's end where judges still feel the need to be involved to feel that they're still in control. The application instructions are clear as they can be. They are also the same for in and out of state residents. It does not change the background process one bit.

Background aka fingerprints. It's the same thing. My entire application at my PD took less than 3 weeks and it's not at the court. I will repeat what I said. He is lying.

Thanks for confirming. Let's hope gloucester county takes away the restrictions and the judge zoom meeting app together sooner than later.

i was also told that by my PD when i applied and i am hearing now and i believe few people have already went for an in person meeting with the the judge. i believe NortherYankee did an in person appearance.

i saw your permit in an earlier post. congrats. i am not happy about being restricted to the gun i qualified with but i will have to be patient once this gets changed and our permits get ammended. i am hearing GFH (guns for hire) is making some serious noise and causing the courts to issue without requiring appearance. all the courts surrounding their county has been issuing without requiring court appearance. it is very inconvenience that i need to take a day off for a stupid senseless interview.

He's lying. Identigo is same day. I did mind on Thursday 8/4 and my PD received it on 8/5

See the problem here is your mentality, not mocking you for your specific thinking. But the issue is most of us had the same thought. What if... And what if... That's what kept us new jersyans from getting what we were owed a long time ago, we just simply admitted defeated and sat there and let them do as they please until a couple of guys from. Nj and NY sued for the right to carry and they both made it to the SCOTUS and we finally won. Nothing to reconsider here honestly. NYS is getting sued to the moon and back and they're going to have to comply sooner than later with a fake smile on their faces. Bruen made it VERY clear to the law and what is considered unconstitutional and they're defying it 100% and it's only a stalling tactic. They simply CANNOT make everywhere a sensitive place. As for liability insurance. I have us Lawshield. I'm pursuing this and I'll keep donating to all the organizations that keep fighting for us until we get all this nonsense sorted out and it will shortly.

They simply cannot make all places sensitive.