SpecialK

I doubt I'll ever see eye to eye on this issue with the 21 age crowd. I just don't understand the mentality of they are immature, so we are going to continue to treat them as immature. People act how you treat them no matter the age. I have taken kids as young as 6 shooting and they acted mature because they were treated as mature. This just seams like a terrible circle to me. they are immature (supposedly) because we don't force responsibility on them, so the answer is that we will remove all responsibilities from them?

damn my posting after a few Just glad someone caught it honestly.

I taught a 6 year old how to shoot with a .22 rifle before. Every kid is different though. If they can handle it they can handle it, the specific age is irrelevant. The younger you start drilling in the safety rules the better they will stick.

Bravo! Teach that boy some trigger discipline though sorry had to It warms my heart to see young shooters being trained. Our future is bleak without them.

if by academy you mean police academy he can legally carry one of these http://www.rangerjoes.com/Benchmade-Knife-Pardue-P2498.aspx I had one of these before I moved to NJ. I just left it with a friend since switch blades are illegal for the common man in NJ.

those 200 lbs salt licks are sure worth the money eh? Jerky, make jerky.

I am all for firearms education. It should not be just for those that want to carry firearms. I agree everyone should have to take these courses in school. The 2nd Amendment applies to everyone. The average citizen should be educated on firearms safety. It is part of our Country's culture and by the supreme law of the land is not going away.

this site is going to be the end of me.

Still no crime at all. You are not responsible for someone picking up your gun in your home and shooting someone with it. Would I be committing a crime if someone came over and picked up one of my kitchen knives and stabbed another person in my house? No. Why the assumption that there is some sort of charge for the home owner? Only because it was a gun?

why would the homeowner face anything? Even in this retarded state there isn't any law that he could be charged of. 23? Oh no an irresponsible 23 year old. Everyone is going to start using their infallible logic to say we should make all CCW people be at least 24! Idiots come in all shapes, sizes and ages. anyone still want to argue about the weakness of a .22?

I like these a lot, but I rather just weave them myself.

with having to change magazines every 10 rounds I don't see the big deal about it jamming a lot. I highly doubt anyone will bother trying to make a 15 rounder for it, a 30 most likely, but a demand for NJ compliant one I doubt it. Besides it will be a great gun to practice clearing a misfire on if it jams a lot

18. The drinking laws here are ridiculous, to refer to them or to "science" (The US has the highest drinking age of the entire world and we are not the top of the standardized test or any other measure of intelligence) is a great way to show how you have been conditioned to regurgitate what you have learned. Are some 18 year olds' questionable on if I would trust them on carrying a firearm, yes. Are some 19 year olds questionable if I would trust them on carrying a firearm, yes. Are some 20 year olds questionable if I would trust them on carrying a firearm, yes. Are some 21 year olds questionable if I would trust them on carrying a firearm, yes. Are some 22 year olds questionable if I would trust them on carrying a firearm, yes. Are some 23 year olds questionable if I would trust them on carrying a firearm, yes. Are some 24 year olds questionable if I would trust them on carrying a firearm, yes....Are some 50 year olds questionable if I would trust them on carrying a firearm, yes. That is not the point!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT IS A RIGHT not something that should even be up for debate. Maybe only people age 35 and up should be allowed, since they are the only people that can be President and are you truly an American if you cannot become President? Perhaps no rights should apply to anyone until their 35th birthday.

If a Subaru Outback is an option I can give it a huge +1. I drive an Outback Wagon and love it. It halls all me gear and all the people I need. I drove from Colorado, to Arizona and then here to Jersey towing 2 times the recommended towing weight and it performed like a champ. The nickname my car has among friends and family is "supercar" While not so much an issue here, in Colorado it conquer the steep icy mountain roads over and over. Great on gas mileage. I bought my 2003 Subie in 2006 and have since put 70K on it on top of the 70K miles it already had. Haven't put any more money into it besides general maintenance. At about 140K miles I am thinking I will get another 4 years before I buy a new car, but only because I'll want something, not because I'll need something.

bwahahahahaha!

oh my god you are right thankful one of my first purchases when I got to this state was a comfy bed for the spare room and a comfy couch, so if the missus gets upset at how much I start spending I am set.

I personally hate getting stuff that I don't care for, don't want and/or need. Cash. If they think it is tacky when you give it to them that just means you didn't give enough I rather everyone who is going to give me a present just give me 20 bucks and then I can pool it together and get something I really wanted instead of little trinkets. If you are set on giving gifts I would suggests you stay away form clothing as getting the right fit is hard to do. Your best bet is consumables like wine, chocolates, candy, cheeses, ammo... this way the person has something they can use. Plus if they don't like it they can consume it just that once, throw it out, or re-gift it easily without feeling like they have to keep it around b/c you gave it to them.

aren't they all? Hell if the ones that aren't going to follow the law and issue it in the 30 day period I'll be sad to see a department not following the law in the other way get in trouble. Knowing this state though...

our second question is a 2 part question. On a scale of 1 to 10 how much do you hate the U.S. Constitution and why?

+1 to the above and well good thing all of those guns that would be illegal here were just lost in a tragic boating accident and you won't have to deal with the crazy NJ laws.

I can say I would not have shot the guy either. I take no pleasure in even thinking about taking another persons life. I guess we are just both coming with our own biases to the table though as we don't know how the laws are written and enforce in the location this incident happened. I keep hearing over and over that the CCWer would go to jail, which is a Jersey Thing(I can say that phrase now that i'm a resident here ). While if this had happened in the county I lived in while in Colorado it would have been found a justifiable shooting as law abiding citizen trumps bad guy there.

ka-bar if you're a marine M9 if you are army butter knife if you are air force I carried the issued M9 with me in Iraq and brought a ka-bar, but never used it. If I could go back and do it again I would hav liked to bring one of these with me though https://www.kabar.com/product/productDetail.do?productNumber=BK3&mode=category&categoryId=1,7,9&categoryName=Military/Tactical

Where did you learn this? NJ perhaps? In Colorado I was allowed to use my firearm to protect myself and others from harm. That was of course was learned in Colorado, not NJ though.

1) This didn't take place in NJ, so using NJ logic and laws to think about the situation won't work. 2) I never said he was a threat to the shooter. I said he was a threat, meaning that he was armed and a criminal that just demonstrated that he was willing to use a gun to take property from others. That is enough of a threat for someone to get shot in a lot of states. 3) If this happened in NJ I agree with you 100%