njpilot

That's what I did when I was in AZ.

I said no thanks the first attempt, then they offered the 176 piece first aid kit for free. I figured I'd try your code for another $10 off and it worked. Can't beat it.

Thanks Tony! I got 2, plus I joined and used your code, + a free first aid kit, free shipping and 2 $10 coupons all of $32.

Edit: Nevermind, just tried it and it says it is. Doh!

Doesn't say anythng about buy one get one free. Does it just show up in the cart or is it over?

I hear what you're saying Bob and I'm not suggesting we do nothing, but I'm a little too cynical to think that the crooks and anti-gunners in Trenton will simply think "Hey, yeah, we can save money by getting rid of the permit system." I believe that if anything, they would use those reasons to make it more difficult and costly for us. Just my opinon. I don't have a whole lot of faith in anyone in Trenton to do what is right.

Paid off the right people?

I think we need to be careful. If such things were suggested, they very well may come back with, "you're right, it takes too much of our resources, therefore we will only handle firearm paperwork one day a month. You're right, we are losing money, therefore we will need to increase fees for our services." You never know how they will go around your arguement.

Welcome to the forum.

Welcome to the forum.

Welcome to the forum.

Welcome to the forum.

Welcome to the forum.

Welcome tot he forum.

Welcome to the forum Jeff.

Congratulations Kevin and thanks for serving!

Congratulations!

Welcome to the forum.

http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/forum/96-tj-sporting-arms-bayville-nj/

Welcome to the forum.

Didn't see anything in the story about a .50 cal. .50s are already banned in CA.

Hey Luis, welcome back!!

Welcome to the forum Joe.

Nice pics Jack!

Well, at least some good news, for now. http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?id=6641 One Pro- and One Anti-Gun Bill Defeated in the Connecticut Joint Committee on Judiciary Monday, April 18, 2011 The Connecticut Joint Committee on Judiciary took no action on two gun-related bills by the April 15 deadline. Due to the committee’s lack of action, these bills were defeated for the 2011 legislative session. Anti-gun bill, SB 1094, was a bill in search of a problem, despite the recent media attention given to “large capacity” magazines, no correlation exists between the size or arbitrary capacity of a detachable magazine and violent crime. Owners of “large capacity” magazines are not criminals or individuals intent on committing atrocious acts; they are sportsmen or firearm enthusiasts who own the magazines for a variety of lawful reasons, including sport, competition or self-defense. SB 1094 would prohibit the possession of firearm magazines that accept more than ten rounds of ammunition. If passed and signed into law, any person in possession of any magazine greater than ten rounds, who has not already surrendered the magazine prior to enactment or within ninety days after enactment, will be guilty of a class D felony. Pro-gun and self-defense bill, SB 1210 would have created a presumption under Connecticut law that it is reasonable to believe that deadly physical force is necessary to defend oneself from a person who has unlawfully entered a dwelling. Thank you to all of those who attended the hearing and contacted members of the Judiciary Committee. The NRA will continue to keep you updated on any further firearm-related legislation of importance moving through the Connecticut legislature.