njpilot
Premier Member
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by njpilot
-
Actually that was McGreevey.
-
Yeah, except now they've come out and said they will sell to LE. Why are they going to bother to move out of CO if they will continue to sell to LE in states that ban civilians. Hypocrits. And to think I sent them emails the other day thanking them for standing up for the people. http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/02/daniel-zimmerman/magpul-breaks-bad-continues-sales-to-ban-state-leos/
-
Don and Jimmy, we need to get all 3 of our 700s out to CJ one day and get a pic of all 3 together,
-
-
No worries ED. Yes, pests.
-
Yeah, not so much that part, as we are and have been full of "nosy nannies and gun banners" for years. Just that he's appears to be a strong supporter of 2A and isn't afraid to tell someone against it to leave. In 1983, the town I grew up in was being "infiltrated" with NYs. The town decided to pass an discharge ban because all of these NYs were scared, seeing a hunter walking down the road with a shotgun over his shoulder. So the town decided to pass the discharge law. Happened even here in NJ. Losing our freedoms due to " liberal out-of-staters" "trying to get away from where they came from, and then pompously demand that Wyoming New Jersey conform to their way of thinking."
-
Nice Don, looks great. $125 seems very reasonable.
-
That guy needs to be removed from the board immediately. 5 round magazines? F*ck him! I just went to the NRA website to write a nasty email, but it's down. Going to call them tomorrow. So should everyone else. If they are going to let this jackass speak as an NRA board member, they won't get another dime from me.
-
Don't like it, leave! http://www.theblaze....rry-in-schools/ BY ALL MEANS, LEAVE’: THE AMAZINGLY BLUNT RESPONSE ONE STATE REP. GAVE A CITIZEN WHO WROTE HIM OPPOSING CONCEALED CARRY IN SCHOOLS Feb. 24, 2013 12:12pm Madeleine Morgenstern Get out of here. That was one Wyoming state representative’s message to a resident who contacted him recently stating her opposition to a bill that would have allowed people with concealed carry permits to carry guns in public schools, colleges and sporting events. Rev. Audette Fulbright had emailed all state legislators, including Republican Rep. Hans Hunt, earlier this month to say she and her husband had just moved to Wyoming and were “seriously reconsidering” their decision amid the proposed expansion of gun laws. “Ample evidence has shown that schools and guns do not mix, and in particular, guns in the hands of amateurs/non-professionals is extremely dangerous, especially in any highly-charged situation,” Fulbright wrote. “To expose our children to greater risk in their schools by encouraging more guns on campuses is something that we cannot allow.” Fulbright also said she was concerned about “the profoundly serious dangers of fracking” and said the question of whether to leave was “wrenching to all of us.” “I know of other new-to-Wyoming families in similar contemplation. Your choices matter. It would be sad to see an exodus of educated, childrearing age adults from Wyoming as a result of poor lawmaking,” she wrote. Hunt’s response? “By all means, leave.” “I’ll be blunt,” he wrote back. “If you don’t like the political atmosphere of Wyoming, then by all means, leave. We, who have been here a very long time (I am proudly 4th generation) are quite proud of our independent heritage.” Fulbright is not one of Hunt’s constituents, but he was one of just two lawmakers who responded to her letter. The other, state Rep. Mary Throne (D), said the bill had moved to committee and to contact committee members. It has since been shot down by legislators. Fulbright told the Casper Star-Tribune her family moved from Virginia in July to have access to better schools and a beautiful environment. “Apparently I have to live here a certain amount of time before I have an opinion,” she told the newspaper. Hunt, who was the youngest member of the Wyoming legislature when he was elected in 2010 didn’t back down from his response. “Was it blunt? Yes. Would I apologize? No,” Hunt told the Star-Tribune. He said later: “If I had to do it again, would I sit and think about how to phrase my words more carefully? Probably.” Read the full correspondence below: Fulbright’s email: Dear Representative, I hope you are taking care of yourself during this busy session. I know it is a challenging, compressed time. I am writing to express my grave concern about House Bill 105. Ample evidence has shown that schools and guns do not mix, and in particular, guns in the hands of amateurs/non-professionals is extremely dangerous, especially in any highly-charged situation. to expose our children to greater risk in their schools by encouraging more guns on campuses is something that we cannot allow. My husband and I moved to Wyoming not too long ago. We believed it was a good place to raise children. With the recent and reactive expansion of gun laws and the profoundly serious dangers of fracking, we find we are seriously reconsidering our decision, which is wrenching to all of us. However, the safety of our family must come first. We are waiting to see what the legislature does this session. I know of other new-to-Wyoming families in similar contemplation. Your choices matter. It would be sad to see an exodus of educated, childrearing age adults from Wyoming as a result of poor lawmaking. sincerely, Rev. Audette Fulbright Hunt’s response: Rev. Fulbright, I’ll be blunt. If you don’t like the political atmosphere of Wyoming, then by all means, leave. We, who have been here a very long time (I am proudly 4th generation) are quite proud of our independent heritage. I don’t expect a “mass exodus” from our state just because we’re standing up for our rights. As to your comments on fracking, I would point out that you’re basing your statement on “dangers” that have not been scientifically founded or proved as of yet. It offends me to no end when liberal out-of-staters such as yourself move into Wyoming, trying to get away from where they came from, and then pompously demand that Wyoming conform to their way of thinking. We are, and will continue to be, a state which stands a head above the rest in terms of economic security. Our ability to do that is, in large part, to our “live and let live” mentality when it comes to allowing economic development, and limiting government oversight. So, to conclude, if you’re so worried about what our legislature is working on, then go back home. Sincerely, Hans Hunt Representative Hans Hunt House District 02
-
Welcome
-
Welcome
-
Here ya go: http://rationalgun.blogspot.com/2013/02/there-always-seems-to-be-problem-with.html
-
Well said Spectre
-
-
-
But they will still lose them because Magpul has said no thank you to the offer.
-
Welcome. I hope your "flash suppressor" is a actually a muzzle break or compensator as flash suppressors are illegal in NJ.
-
-
Pretty much the same here in District 11. PA is looking better and better everyday.
-
Don't know if you posted this in response to my SCOTUS response,but if so, I'm not saying wait until after things are passed to fight it, but don't give up things hoping they will give us something else. They don't care. They would prefer to totally remove all our firearms. We can write letter all we want, and I have been, but this will come down to Christie signing or vetoing. If he signs, then our only hope is in the courts.
-
Done.
-
Why are people on here so quick to say "I'll take 10 round mags if I can CCW"? How about we get rid of our 15 round mags and get 30 round mags and get CCW? Listening to Gura in the CCW case, sounds like we have a chance it could go our way. Even so, it will be decided by SCOTUS, hopefully in our favor. Why offer to give up one thing in hope of getting something else they won't give in to anyway? That's ridiculous. Do you think Cryan, Mainor, Greenwald, Weinberg, et al are going to say, "ok, we'll reduce your mags to 10 and give you CCW for being so accommodating"? Give me a break, they will do what they want, screw you. Why even go there?
-
No lawsuits can be filed until the laws are passed and someone can show they were "harmed" by the legislation. At least that last part applies to SCOTUS. Unfortunately, these asshats can pass unconstitutional laws all day long, but until someone is harmed by hit, SCOTUS won't take it up, don't know about lower courts.
-
A little long, but good reads. http://freedomoutpos...u-to-disarm-us/ http://patriotupdate.com/articles/are-you-all-talk-or-will-you-put-teeth-behind-your-position/
-